The State Worker

Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers

May 13, 2010
Schwarzenegger's 'unusual' letter to the state Supreme Court

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Gavel.jpgDavid Tyra -- the private attorney whose firm, Kronick Moskovitz Tiedeman and Gerard, has been retained by the Schwarzenegger administration for furlough litigation -- has asked the state Supreme Court to consider taking up a case that the administration has twice lost.

Well, that's sort of what he asked. Stay with us on this.

On Tuesday, the court received this hand-delivered letter from Tyra, asking that the court use its authority to review CASE v. Schwarzenegger. The administration lost the case last year after a San Francisco judge determined that furloughing State Fund legal staff violated state insurance code. The 1st District Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's decision.

Here's how the Tyra letter begins:

100511 Trya letter.JPG

The same day that the court received Tyra's letter, Chief Justice Ronald George signed off on this one-sentence order:

The time for granting review on the court's own motion is hearby extended to and including July 17, 2010.

On Wednesday, CASE attorney Pat Whalen fired off this letter to the court. He blasted the Tyra letter as a backdoor ploy to petition the court long after the deadline for doing so expired:

100512 CASE letter to SC.JPG

We sent the Tyra and Whalen letters to McGeorge Law School professor Athena Roussos this morning. She said that the Tyra letter is "extremely unusual. I've never seen a letter like that before."

Did the administration make a mistake and miss the April 28 deadline to file its appeal to the Supreme Court? Was it part of a part of a larger strategy, given that around that same time Schwarzenegger was trying to convince the high court to consolidate and consider seven key furlough lawsuits?

(The court rejected the consolidation request on April 22. That was four days after the 1st District Court's State Fund decision became final and six days before the deadline to appeal it.)

"It looks to me like they blew the deadline," Roussos said. "But Kronick is a great firm, very competent. It could have been a conscious decision. I don't know why they didn't file a petition. I guess at this point that (the administration) really has nothing to lose."

The CASE letter probably "won't have a huge impact" on what the court does next, Roussos said, but it does get the union's objections on the record.

We've asked the administration to explain why it didn't file a timely appeal to the court and to answer the charge that it is trying to circumvent the rules. We'll report when we hear back.


About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments
blog comments powered by Disqus

About The State Worker

Jon Ortiz The Author

Jon Ortiz launched The State Worker blog and a companion column in 2008 to cover state government from the perspective of California government employees. Every day he filters the news through a single question: "What does this mean for state workers?" Join Ortiz for updates and debate on state pay, benefits, pensions, contracts and jobs. Contact him at (916) 321-1043 and at


Now on the State Worker column

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]

State Pay Database

This database allows you to search the salaries of California's 300,000-plus state workers and view up to four years of their pay history.

Latest Capitol Alert headlines

    404 - Not Found - The Sacramento Bee, Sacramento, California

    404 Not Found

    Our apologies....

    We can't find the page you requested in this location.

    The story may have moved or expired.

    You may wish to:

  • » More on the Capitol Alert blog


May 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Monthly Archives