<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>The State Worker</title>
        <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/</link>
        <atom:link href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/atom.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>Chronicling civil-service life for California state workers</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:48:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>California lawmaker writes &apos;Public Employees Bill of Rights&apos;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/assets_c/2011/03/110304 Dickinson Randal Benton 2010-thumb-150x193-16903.jpg"><img alt="Thumbnail image for 110304 Dickinson Randal Benton 2010.JPG" src="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/assets_c/2011/03/110304 Dickinson Randal Benton 2010-thumb-150x193-16903-thumb-150x193-16904.jpg" width="150" height="193" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></a>Assemblyman <strong>Roger Dickinson</strong>, D-Sacramento,(right) has introduced legislation that would give unionized state workers more workplace discipline protections and <strong> first dibs</strong> on state government work.</p>

<p><strong>SEIU Local 1000</strong> and the <strong>Union of American Physicians and Dentists </strong>support AB 1655, the "Public Employees Bill of Rights Act." Here's what it would do:</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/lawmaker-wants-to-establish-public-employees-bill-of-rights.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/lawmaker-wants-to-establish-public-employees-bill-of-rights.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Bills and initiatives</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Laws / Legal</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Workplace </category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:48:10 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Special agents group loses request to stop CA Justice Department layoffs</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>A Sacramento judge has refused to temporarily halt layoffs planned for the<strong> Department of Justice</strong>, leaving the path clear for about <strong>80 employees</strong> to be shown the exits.</p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.casaofficial.com/" target="-blank">Association of Special Agents</a>, a subset of the <strong>California Statewide Law Enforcement Association</strong>, had sought the temporary restraining order from Judge <strong>Timothy Frawley</strong>. He turned the association down on Friday after hearing brief arguments from both sides.</p>

<p>Many DOJ employees <strong>heeded the layoff warnings</strong> last year and moved on to other jobs or retired. As of this morning, about <strong>73 sworn officers and 8 non-sworn staff </strong>were in department jobs that will be eliminated, DOJ spokeswoman<strong> Lynda Gledhill</strong> said in an email to The State Worker.</p>

<p>DOJ will terminate those workers on Friday, said ASA President <strong>Mike Loyd</strong>.</p>

<p>"They'll be handed their final check, shown the door and told, 'Thanks for your service,'" Loyd said.</p>

<p>When asked whether the ASA would keep up the fight, Loyd said, "Heck yeah."</p>

<p>The association alleges that Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown</strong> engineered the elimination of about 300 jobs -- most of them held by special agents in the department's anti-drug unit -- in retaliation for <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2010/10/unions-pensions-sparked-brown.html" target="_blank">CSLEA's support of Republican <strong>Meg Whitman</strong></a> during the 2010 California gubernatorial race.</p>

<p><br />
The Brown administration blamed the job cuts on <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/12/4049138/state-drug-agents-push-jerry-brown.html" target="_blank">Republicans' tax inflexibility during budget talks.</a></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/special-agents-group-loses-lawsuit-to-stop-california-justice-department-la.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/special-agents-group-loses-lawsuit-to-stop-california-justice-department-la.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Court files</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Laws / Legal</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Layoffs</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:44:33 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bill puts $100,000 cap on future state and local pensions</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/120213%20Don%20Wagner.JPG"><img alt="120213 Don Wagner.JPG" src="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/assets_c/2012/02/120213 Don Wagner-thumb-198x219-23007.jpg" width="198" height="219" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></a>Assemblyman<a href="http://arc.asm.ca.gov/member/70/" target="_blank"> Donald Wagner  </a>(left) has introduced a bill that would cap state and local pensions.</p>

<p>The Irvine Republican's measure, <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_1601-1650/ab_1633_bill_20120209_introduced.html" target="_blank">AB 1633</a>, would cap pensions for workers who don't participate in Social Security at <strong>$100,000 </strong>per year. Workers who do participate in the federal program couldn't receive more than <strong>$80,000 </strong>per year from a state or local pension.</p>

<p>The cap would apply to pensions of employees hired <strong>on or after Jan. 1, 2013</strong>. Conflicting labor contracts in effect on that date would control until they expire, then the state law would be binding and could not be undone by subsequent union agreements.</p>

<p>On a related side note, Bee Capitol Bureau colleague <strong>Torey Van Oot</strong>, who covered the <strong>Democratic Party Convention </strong>in San Diego last weekend tells The State Worker than Gov. <strong>Jerry Brown</strong> didn't mention the "p-word," pensions, in his speech at the confab. Brown has put <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/jerry-brown-delivers-pension-reform-language-to-legislators.html" target="_blank">a 12-point pension reform plan</a> before lawmakers and last month asked them to <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/01/jerry-brown-says-about-public-pensions.html" target="-blank">"do something real"</a> to bring down governments' employee retirement costs.</p>

<p><em><strong>PHOTO:</strong> Assemblyman Donald Wagner / www.asm.ca.gov</em></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/bill-would-cap-state-and-local-pensions-at-100000.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/bill-would-cap-state-and-local-pensions-at-100000.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Bills and initiatives</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Pensions</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:13:06 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>CA prison officers spent more than $1 million on political advice </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the fourth installment in a series of posts detailing the 2011 political spending by California state workers' unions. The records are downloaded from the California Secretary of State's office and reflect activity filed as of <strong>Jan. 31, 2012</strong>.</em></p>

<p>The <strong>California Correctional Peace Officers Association </strong>paid a total <strong>$1.1 million</strong> to four political consultants and a political lawyer last year, according to documents the union filed with the state.</p>

<p>Media strategy firm <strong>The Battin Group</strong> (formerly <a href="http://voterstrategies.com/about.html" target="_blank">Voter Strategies Inc.</a> and run by former Republican lawmaker <strong>Jim Battin</strong>) topped the list with <strong>$342,000</strong> from CCPOA., followed by <strong>$220,000</strong> to <strong>J. S. Peace & Associates</strong>, which is headed by former state lawmaker and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080391/" target="_blank">"Attack of the Killer Tomatoes"</a> producer <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2010/07/businessweek-explores-the-stev.html" target="_blank">Steve Peace</a>. </p>

<p>Other CCPOA expenditures in 2011 included <strong>$200,000</strong> to  former Senate President Pro Tem <strong>Don Perata's</strong> firm, <a href="http://www.peratallc.com/" target="_blank">Perata Consulting LLC</a>, about <strong>$200,000</strong> more to attorney <a href="http://www.lawpolicy.com/sv/ordos.html" target="_blank">Wayne Ordos</a> and<strong> $157,000</strong> to <a href="http://www.mcnallytemple.com/" target="_blank">McNally Temple Associates Inc.</a>, another consulting firm.</p>

<p>The union also gave <strong>$100,000</strong> to the <strong>California Independent Voter Project</strong>, a non-profit organization that<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/10/4043730/california-lawmakers-head-to-hawaii.html" target="-blank"> offers to pay the expenses of state lawmakers who attend an annual Hawaii conference</a>. Peace is one of the non profit's principals.</p>

<p>CCPOA, like many players in the political arena gave money to both sides of the aisle. Last year it wrote checks totaling <strong>$110,000</strong> to the California Democratic Party and <strong>$25,000</strong> to the California Republican Party. </p>

<p>By our count, the union controlled or wholly subsidized at least <strong>nine PACs</strong>, although not all of them took in or paid out money last year. <a href="http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Misc/filerSearch.aspx?SEARCH=california+correctional+peace+officers" target="_blank">Click here</a> for a list that includes the committees.</p>

<p>We focused on the six most active PACS and subtotaled individual expenditures  and contributions of the biggest accounts. Access those figures by clicking the <strong>"expend totals"</strong> or <strong>"contrib totals"</strong> at the bottom of some tables.</p>

<p><strong>Expenditures</strong> pages show everything the association spent on political action, including operating costs. <strong>Contributions</strong> pages break out donations to campaigns and political causes.To get a sense of political spending in California by other interest groups, check out <a href="http://maplight.org/california" target="_blank">Maplight.org</a>. The California data on that site run through December 2010.</p>

<p>Here are the CCPOA numbers:</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/ccpoa-political-spending.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/ccpoa-political-spending.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Facts &amp; Figures</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Union spending</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:07:10 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A.M. Reading: CA contract talks; OK: six years, no raises; SD bonuses; MT health clinic for state workers </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Thumbnail image for newspaper_5.gif" src="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/assets_c/2010/12/newspaper_5-thumb-250x211-15398.gif" width="250" height="211" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/13/4259296/state-employee-unions-arent-counting.html" target="_blank"><strong>State employee unions aren't counting on generous contracts from Democrat Jerry Brown</strong></a><br />
Contract talks kicking off this month between the state and four employee unions present Gov. Jerry Brown with a political dilemma: How does he deal fairly with his key labor constituency without exposing himself to charges he's kowtowing to them? (Sacramento Bee)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/13/4259289/californias-mobile-hospitals-are.html" target="_blank"><strong>California's mobile hospitals are running out of money and time</strong></a><br />
In a cool, 18,000-square-foot warehouse tucked in an industrial Sacramento-area neighborhood sits millions of dollars in equipment California leaders hope never to use. (Sacramento Bee)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/a87789921b1c41719c2220b83f82752f/OK--State-Workers/" target="_blank"><strong>While GOP leaders call for smaller government, Okla. state workers near 6 years since pay hike</strong></a><br />
OKLAHOMA CITY -- Jess Callahan, a state social worker who helps provide services to the elderly, blind and disabled in Choctaw County, hasn't seen a pay raise since 2006, and he's not alone. (AP/ The Republic)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=631462" target="_blank"><strong>In Wisconsin, assessing a new labor law's impact</strong></a><br />
RACINE, Wisconsin -- James Ladwig recently took over the job of Racine County executive. He was sworn in last April, not long after Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker signed a controversial bill curtailing the bargaining rights of state and local workers. So with the new job, Ladwig got a new set of rules for governing his county.  (Stateline)</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/am-reading-ca-contract-talks-six-years-ok-six-years-no-raises-sd-bonuses-mt-health-clinic-for-state-workers.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/am-reading-ca-contract-talks-six-years-ok-six-years-no-raises-sd-bonuses-mt-health-clinic-for-state-workers.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Link journalism</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Morning reading</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:09:44 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Poll: Is the SEIU Local 1000 furlough settlement an unfair deal?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The State Worker continues to hear from state employees who are complaining that <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/01/furlough-lawsuit-deal-affects-only-seiu-workers-drops-four-other-lawsuits.html" target="_blank">a recent furlough lawsuit settlement </a>between <strong>SEIU Local 1000</strong> and the Brown administration is<strong>unfair</strong>.</p>

<p>The complaints run along <strong>two tracks</strong>. One comes from<strong> managers and supervisors in the five "off-budget" agencies named in the settlement. </strong>They're not represented by SEIU or any other unions and aren't part of the furlough agreement. </p>

<p>Callers have pointed out that when a union reaches a contract agreement at the bargaining table that the managers and supervisors attached to those covered workers usually receive <strong>similar terms. </strong></p>

<p>The exempt employees calling and emailing us about the furlough settlement think the same should apply here to the furlough back pay agreement. Of course, <strong>that decision is up to the Brown administration and/or the agencies.</strong></p>

<p>The other complaint comes from state worker blog users who think that settlement provisions that awarded back pay to rank-and-file workers in five "off budget" agencies <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/state-worker-criticizes-seius-decision-to-settle-furlough-cases.html" target="_blank">unfairly and arbitrarily single out a select few employees</a> for a special benefit. </p>

<p>It's a twist on the complaints we heard when <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2009/02/should-constitutional-officer.html" target="_blank">employees working for constitutional officers avoided furlough</a>. Ditto when the courts decided State Compensation Fund Employees were illegally furloughed awarded them back pay. </p>

<p><a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/seiu-local-1000-president-yvonne-walker-talks-about-furlough-lawsuit-settle.html" target="_blank">SEIU has said</a> that it got the most it could from a losing legal hand.</p>

<p>What do you think?<br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdn.widgetserver.com/syndication/subscriber/InsertWidget.js"></script><script type="text/javascript">if (WIDGETBOX) WIDGETBOX.renderWidget('105b6c2b-53d1-4d7f-91f4-eeb6e7d176f2');</script><br />
<noscript>Get the <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com/i/105b6c2b-53d1-4d7f-91f4-eeb6e7d176f2">Poll Creator Pro</a> widget and many other <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com/">great free widgets</a> at <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com">Widgetbox</a>! Not seeing a widget? (<a href="http://support.widgetbox.com/">More info</a>)</noscript></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/furlough-settlements-fair-or-unfair-deal.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/furlough-settlements-fair-or-unfair-deal.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Furloughs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Laws / Legal</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Pay and benefits</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:01:59 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>See how the California Association of Highway Patrolmen spent its money in 2011</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the third in a series of posts that will detail the 2011 political spending by California state workers' unions. The records are downloaded from the <strong>California Secretary of State's office</strong> and reflect activity filed as of <strong>Jan. 31, 2012</strong>.</em></p>

<p>The <strong> California Association of Highway Patrolmen</strong> took in nearly twice as much in contributions as it spent on political activities in 2011. Contributors gave the union <strong>$465,947</strong>, according to reports filed with the state. Only one contribution, <strong>$300</strong> returned from Democratic Sen.<strong> Ron Calderon</strong>, exceeded the $100 threshold for itemized reporting, according to CAHP's filings. </p>

<p>Meanwhile, the association wrote checks for <strong>$223,415</strong> to cover political activities. All but about <strong>$10,000</strong> went to poltical campaigns, mostly via fundraisers. The largest expenses listed on the union's report were <strong>$50,000</strong> for the <strong>Speaker's Cup</strong> golf tournament at <strong>Pebble Beach</strong> and <strong>$50,000 </strong>to the <strong>Pro Tem's Cup </strong>golf event at <strong>Torrey Pines</strong>.</p>

<p>We've embedded a spreadsheet below with pages that detail what CAHP spent on political activities last year and other pages that total up the money. You can access each page by <strong>clicking the tabs </strong>at the bottom of the table. </p>

<p><strong>Expenditures </strong>page show everything the association spent on poltical action, including operating costs. <strong>Contributions</strong> pages break out donations to campaigns and political causes.To get a sense of political spending in California by other interest groups, check out <a href="http://maplight.org/" target="_blank">Maplight.org</a>. The California data on that site run through December 2010.</p>

<p><iframe width='640' height='300' frameborder='0' src='https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AgeJ5Tnt4Uh2dFg2TUFFRHBFcGlrYXFYY2hYakhwVEE&output=html&widget=true'></iframe></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/california-highway-patrol-cahp-political-spending.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/california-highway-patrol-cahp-political-spending.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Union spending</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>State worker criticizes SEIU&apos;s decision to settle furlough cases</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>We've heard from several state workers who aren't happy that <strong>SEIU Local 1000 </strong>settled its furlough litigation in exchange for back wages for<strong> 700 or so</strong> of its members working in "off-budget" agencies. </p>

<p>Local 1000 President <strong>Yvonne Walker </strong><a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/seiu-local-1000-president-yvonne-walker-talks-about-furlough-lawsuit-settle.html" target="_blank">has said </a>that the union's legal team advised that broader litigation wasn't likely to win, so the union cut its losses and <strong>took what it could get</strong> from a settlement. </p>

<p><strong>Paul Warrick</strong>, an associate governmental program analyst, sent an email to The State Worker that hits the tone of the complaints we've heard. We're publishing his email here, <strong>unedited and with his permission</strong>. He's speaking for <strong>himself</strong>, not his employer, colleagues or Local 1000:</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Big whoop!  Someone (or SEIU) should have pursued the larger Federal issue of equal pay for equal work.  Everyone who receives a state payroll check should have been furloughed or no one should have been furloughed.  Furloughs were happenstance.  If you just happened to be an Office Technician, Staff Services Analyst, etc. in the wrong agency (based on funding source or other criteria), you got furloughed while your neighbor who was also an OT or SSA, but worked for another agency didn't get furloughed.  It's just ridiculous.</p>

<p>Paul Warrick DSS</blockquote></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/state-worker-criticizes-seius-decision-to-settle-furlough-cases.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/state-worker-criticizes-seius-decision-to-settle-furlough-cases.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Furloughs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Laws / Legal</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Unions </category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:19:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>San Jose pension estimates questioned</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><embed width="576" height="324" src="http://media.nbcbayarea.com/designvideo/embeddedPlayer.swf?pid=m_k8TyDdXeGAiFV33ELx8MBxp27O8s5P" flashvars="v=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcbayarea.com%2Fi%2Fembed_new%2F%3Fcid%3D138995874&path=%2Fnews/local" allowFullScreen="true" AllowScriptAccess="always" /> <p style="font-size:small">View more videos at: <a href="http://nbcbayarea.com/?__source=embedCode">http://nbcbayarea.com</a>.</p></p>

<p><em>Thanks to <strong>Blog User J f</strong>or flagging this story for The State Worker.</em></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/san-jose-pension-estimates-questioned.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/san-jose-pension-estimates-questioned.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Business of Government</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">CalPERS / CalSTRS / retirement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Pensions</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:45:35 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Column Extra: See the court documents filed by CCPOA, CSLEA, to drop furlough lawsuits </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><em>With just 400 to 450 words for our weekly State Worker column, some of what we learn each week never sees print. <strong>Column Extras</strong> give you the notes, the quotes and the observations that inform what's published.</em></p>

<p><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/09/4250036/the-state-worker-some-california.html" target="_blank">Today's State Worker column </a>breaks down which unions are<strong> in</strong> and which are <strong>out </strong>of the court fight over furloughs. The <strong>California Correctional Peace Officers Association</strong> and the <strong>California Statewide Law Enforcement Association</strong> are the latest to lay down arms. </p>

<p>CCPOA spokesman JeVaughn Baker said that the weight of several court decisions favoring the state pushed the union to stop its litigation: "We decided it's in the best interest of the association to focus on other issues."</p>

<p><strong>SEIU Local 1000</strong> and <strong>California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges and Hearing Officers in State Employment</strong> also recently dropped their furlough litigation.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, the state's <strong>engineers</strong> and <strong>scientists </strong>are <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/unions-representing-california-engineers-scientists-continue-furlough-fight.html" target="_blank>continuing the battle with some new legal arguments.</a></p>

<p>You can view the the latest requests for dismissal of the furlough cases by<strong> clicking the case numbers below</strong>. We've also added <strong>links to the original petitions</strong> so that you can delve more deeply into the legal arguments behind each case that union lawyers now say have been disabled by<strong> subsequent court decisions.</strong></p>

<p>CCPOA's request for dismissal: <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2-2-12%20Request%20for%20Dismissal%20%28CCPOA%29.pdf" target="_blank">Alameda Superior Court No. RG10630312</a><br />
Original petition: <a href="http://apps.alameda.courts.ca.gov/domainweb/service?ServiceName=DomainWebService&TemplateName=jsp/imgviewer.html&rofadt=08/11/10&Action=24829265" target="_blank"><em>CCPOA v. Schwarzenegger</em></a> (requires Java)</p>

<p>CSLEA's request for dismissal, <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2-2-12%20Request%20for%20Dismissal%20%28CSLEA%29%20%281%29.pdf" target="_blank">Alameda Superior Court No. RG10507081</a><br />
Original petition: <a href="http://apps.alameda.courts.ca.gov/domainweb/service?ServiceName=DomainWebService&TemplateName=jsp/imgviewer.html&rofadt=03/30/10&Action=24274797" target="_blank"><em>CSLEA v. Schwarzenegger</em></a></p>

<p>CCPOA's request for dismissal: <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/Newton-case-dismissal.pdf" target="_blank">9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals</a><br />
Original Complaint: <a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/110107%20CCPOA%20federal%20furlough%20complaint.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Newton v. Schwarzenegger</em></a><br />
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/column-extra-see-the-court-documents-filed-by-ccpoa-cslea-to-drop-furlough.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/column-extra-see-the-court-documents-filed-by-ccpoa-cslea-to-drop-furlough.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">CCPOA</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Court files</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Furloughs</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Pay and benefits</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Unions </category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:37:36 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>A.M. Reading: Pension reform effort suspended; SD rethinks collective bargaining; SC&apos;s pay and pension idea</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Thumbnail image for newspaper_5.gif" src="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/assets_c/2010/12/newspaper_5-thumb-250x211-15398.gif" width="250" height="211" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/08/4247187/democrats-gear-up-to-fight-part.html" target="_blank"><strong>Democrats gear up to fight part-time Legislature measure</strong></a><br />
A Democratic political strategist and a former Democratic assemblyman will help lead opposition to a proposed ballot initiative that would reduce California's Legislature to part-time. (Sacramento Bee)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/09/4250036/the-state-worker-some-california.html" target="_blank"><strong>The State Worker: Some California unions drop furlough cases; two soldier on</strong></a><br />
The California Correctional Peace Officers Association quietly dropped two furlough lawsuits last week, one in Alameda Superior Court and the other a federal case before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. (Sacramento Bee)</p>

<p><a href="http://blogs.app.com/capitolquickies/2012/02/08/sick-pay-cashouts-for-nj-public-workers-the-talk-of-the-day/" target="_blank"><strong>Sick pay cashouts for NJ public workers the talk of the day</strong></a><br />
Emotions ran high Wednesday at a conference of New Jersey mayors, some of whom demanded stepped-up state assistance in controlling municipal budgets, with others being lashed by a legislator for creating massive taxpayer liabilities to public workers for unused sick pay. (Asbury Park Press)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/09/4250305/group-suspends-california-public.html" target="_blank"><strong>Group suspends California public pension reform ballot effort</strong></a><br />
The cause of pension reform in California took a significant body shot Wednesday when a group hoping to put an overhaul measure before voters this year suspended its campaign. (Sacramento Bee)</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/am-reading-pension-reform-effort-suspended-sd-rethinks-collective-bargaining-scs-pay-and-pension-idea.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/am-reading-pension-reform-effort-suspended-sd-rethinks-collective-bargaining-scs-pay-and-pension-idea.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Link journalism</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Morning reading</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:22:05 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>California pension reform group suspends initiative campaign</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>A group that hoped to put a sweeping public employee pension reform measure on the November ballot is suspending its campaign.</p>

<p>"It's a sad day for pension reform in California," said <strong>Aaron McLear</strong>, spokesman for Sacramento-based <strong>California Pension Reform</strong>.</p>

<p>Although the group had drafted two measures that qualified for signature collection, it couldn't raise the $2 million or so needed to mount the petition effort for either one. </p>

<p>In November, Calfornia Pension Reform submitted a proposal to put future state and local public employees into defined contribution plans and another measure that would have shifted future workers into hybrid pensions. In January, it received the title and summary for both, intending to determine which would poll better and then shop that plan to potential campaign donors.</p>

<p>The language that came back from Attorney General <strong>Kamala Harris</strong>' office was worded to make it unpopular with voters, the pension reform group complained. The language was "false and misleading," it said in a press statement today. </p>

<p>And that made it harder to find money, McLear said.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/california-pension-reform-group-suspends-ballot-initiative-campaign.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/california-pension-reform-group-suspends-ballot-initiative-campaign.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Pensions</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:01:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>See California state attorneys union&apos;s political spending in 2011</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the second in a series of posts that will detail the 2011 political spending by California state workers' unions. The records are <strong>downloaded from the California Secretary of State's office </strong>and reflect activity filed as of Jan. 31, 2012.</em></p>

<p><strong>California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges and Hearing Officers in State Employment</strong> reported political contributions of <strong>$154,200 </strong>and political expenditures of <strong>$206,443</strong>, according to records published by the state.</p>

<p><strong>The expense report tallies all political spending, including the contributions figures that break out money that went to politicians and issues campaigning.</strong> </p>

<p>The <strong>California Democratic Central Committee</strong> received the most money, $37,700. Rank-and-file members contributed a little over <strong>$41,000 </strong>to the CASE PAC. Nearly all of that came in $10 donations. CASE represents roughly 3,400 employees.</p>

<p>We've embedded a spreadsheet below with pages that detail what CASE received and gave last year and other pages that total up the money. To get a sense of political spending in California by <strong>other interest groups</strong>, check out <a href="http://Maplight.org" target="_blank">Maplight.org</a>. The California data on the site run through December 2010.</p>

<p><iframe width='640' height='400' frameborder='0' src='https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0AgeJ5Tnt4Uh2dFdXWTZ6U25jWGhrTkdIcDBNNTNtblE&output=html&widget=true'></iframe></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/california-attorney-union-case-political-spending-2011.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/california-attorney-union-case-political-spending-2011.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Union spending</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:29:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>See SEIU Local 1000 political action committees&apos; 2011 spending</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><em>This is the first in a series of posts that will detail the 2011 political spending by California state workers' unions. The records are downloaded from the California Secretary of State's office and reflect activity filed as of Jan. 31, 2012.</em></p>

<p>A political action committees operated by <strong>SEIU Local 1000</strong> gave <strong>$380,000 </strong>to campaigns and organizations last year, including nearly <strong>$195,000</strong> to the <strong>Democratic State Central Committee of California</strong>, according to records filed with the state.</p>

<p>The union also donated a total of <strong>$21,000</strong> to help retire 2010 campaign debts for Democrats such as Assemblyman <strong>Das Williams</strong>, D-Santa Barbara; Assemblyman <strong>Sandré Swanson</strong>, D-Alameda; and Assemblyman<strong> Bob Wieckowski</strong>, D-Fremont, among others.</p>

<p>One of the union's PACs donated several hundred dollars of staff time to politicians, including Controller<strong> John Chiang.</strong></p>

<p>For a list of the union's political entities, <a href="http://cal-access.ss.ca.gov/Misc/filerSearch.aspx?SEARCH=local+1000" target="_blank">click here.</a> The union's reports to the state duplicated some expenditures. <strong>Note: </strong>The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1991 that public sector employees may not be compelled to subsidize political or ideological activities of public employee unions.</p>

<p>We've embedded a spreadsheet below that details how the union's various political entities received and gave last year. To get a sense of political spending in California by other interest groups, check out <a href="http://maplight.org/california/interest" target="_blank">Maplight.org </a>(the California data on the site run through December 2010).</p>

<p><em><strong>Editor's note, 2:29 p.m.:</strong> An earlier version of this post incorrectly stated that unions could not use members' dues to fund PACs. </em></p>

<p><iframe width='640' height='400' frameborder='0' src='https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0AgeJ5Tnt4Uh2dHJfeGVSN2lpQnVXNDgyMVhlUDhjNmc&output=html&widget=true'></iframe><br />
</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/seiu-local-1000-political-spending.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/seiu-local-1000-political-spending.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Union spending</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:17:00 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>California Prison Industry Authority: Agency business costs hurt bottom line </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>After years of profitability, the <strong>California Prison Industry Authority</strong> suffered a<strong> $15.3 million loss </strong>last year, according to its<a href="http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/120206%20CAPIA-Fiscal-2010-11.pdf" target="_blank"> latest annual report</a> to the state Legislature.</p>

<p>The losses in<strong> fiscal 2010-11 </strong>came from a <strong>$17.4 million drop in operating revenues</strong> and <strong>$8.6 million </strong>the self-funded PIA set aside in anticipation of <strong>settling union furlough lawsuits</strong>. The authority also paid<strong> $6.3 million</strong> to cover <strong>Other Post-Employment Benefits</strong> such as retiree health care and a <strong>$2.8 million</strong> expense from factory closures. </p>

<p>"If not for the furlough expense, the annual OPEB charge, and the onetime costs associated with factory closures, CALPIA would have continued its profitability in FY 2010-11," the report says.</p>

<p>The PIA oversees <strong>four inmate training programs</strong> that operate manufacturing, service, and agriculture industries at 22 correctional facilities. They produce everything from modular buildings and fire protection gear to furniture and pre-packaged meals. Most of what PIA makes is purchased by the state or other government entities. </p>

<p>More than <strong>7,000 inmates </strong>participate, saving the state "more than <strong>$11 million annually </strong>in General Fund costs for rehabilitation positions that CDCR does not have to fund," the annual report says. Those inmates make between 30 and 95 cents per hour before deductions.</p>

<p>Participants without a high school diploma must earn a GED within two years to continue in the program. <strong>Joint Venture Program </strong>participants earn a comparable wage less deductions for things like taxes, room and board, crime victim compensation, government-ordered restitution such as child support. Inmates in the program also have to put money into a savings account.</p>

<p>Graduates from the PIA's <strong>Career Technical Education</strong> program, which gives inmates "hands-on experience in real world training," were <strong>89 percent</strong> less likely to return to prison when compared with the prison system's general population, according to the report. Overall, PIA participants across the board had a <strong>24 percent to 30 percent lower recidivism rate</strong> than the general prison population.   </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/california-prison-industry-authority-report-says-its-programs-significantly.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2012/02/california-prison-industry-authority-report-says-its-programs-significantly.html#mi_rss=The%20State%20Worker</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Audits and reports</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">CDCR</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:33:51 -0800</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
