Living Columns & Blogs

Carolyn Hax: Dad’s driven to anger by debt delinquency from son, his fiancée

DEAR CAROLYN: My wife and I have supported our son and his fiancée, financially and otherwise, for years. Including legal issues for her. Prior to our retirement from two careers to one pension, our son asked us to sell him our car, which we did contractually. His fiancée objected because she thought they should have it for free.

Since then they have stopped making payments and have been out of contact for months. My wife wants to avoid confrontation. I feel my son should step up, be a man and not be influenced. Although I remain cordial, am I being the bad guy here? I believe their next move is to come visit and pretend like there is nothing between us.

J.

DEAR J.: Your wife wants to avoid, you want to confront … but what about the middle ground, where you actually talk? One-on-one, without his fiancée around: “It isn’t like you to go back on a promise. Are you OK?”

There’s also something in the way you state your case. “Be a man and not be influenced” tells me you don’t believe a (real) man can be abused or controlled by a woman. But the fact of an intimate relationship means a person is vulnerable to abuse, period, without regard for gender or gender role.

If all you imply in your letter is true – that the fiancee is of poor character and is psychologically holding the strings – then what your son needs is a safe, nonjudgmental place to admit what’s going on at home.

Possibly even more important, family members who don’t judge him can, over time, allow him to recall who he was before the unhealthy relationship formed. It’s a long shot, perhaps, but it’s a chance – and you can be that chance for him if you choose not to accept appearances as the last word.

DEAR CAROLYN: Am I being petty? My daughter was married two months ago. We invited the parents of our son-in-law’s brother’s fiancée. It was a small, 80-person invite list.

The brother is now getting married and we are not invited. My son-in law is the best man. The invite list was 200 people. I feel disrespected by this omission. Should I just accept it as bad manners?

Roamer

DEAR ROAMER: Inviting them as part of an unspoken quid-pro-quo, and then judging them harshly for not holding up their end, sounds like bad manners to me.

You went above and beyond in your inclusion, and that’s lovely. Don’t de-lovely it by bad-mouthing people you don’t even know. Wish them all well. Make other plans for the wedding day. Look for reasons to feel joy, vs. excuses to take offense.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com or follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax.

  Comments