California’s two major railroad companies have filed suit in federal court challenging a state law requiring railroads to come up with an oil spill prevention and response plan.
The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the United States District Court in Sacramento, contends federal laws largely prohibit states from imposing safety rules on railroads such as the one’s California began imposing July 1 of this year. The plaintiffs in the matter are the Union Pacific Railroad, the BNSF and the Association of American Railroads.
The lawsuit targets sections of a law, SB 861, that require railroads transporting crude oil to participate in a state program that assures financing to clean up crude oil spills. It also requires the railroads to obtain a “certificate of financial responsibility” from the state, as proof that they have enough money to cover oil spill damages.
“Federal law exempts this entire regime,” the railroads wrote in the lawsuit. The lawsuits argues that the federal government already has numerous safety measures in place governing hazardous materials transport.
The main portion of the bill imposes a 6.5-cent fee on oil companies for every barrel of crude that arrives in California on rail, or that is piped to refineries from inside the state. The resulting funds, estimated at $11 million in the first full year, will be allocated for oil spill prevention and preparation work, and for emergency cleanup costs. The efforts will be focused on spills that threaten waterways, and will allow officials to conduct response drills.
The railroads do not appear to be challenging the fee portion of the law, which is directed at oil companies, not railroads. Attorneys for the railroads could not be reached for immediate comment.
Officials with the state Office of Spill Prevention and Response, the state agency listed as defendant, could not be reached for comment.