An analysis from a team of California Department of Transportation experts, released Thursday after more than a year of preparation, confirmed data problems involving radiation-based tests of reinforced concrete foundations for nine bridges or other freeway structures, including the Benicia-Martinez Bridge.
Caltrans executives examined additional records for the structures and deemed all safe, despite falsifications or testing errors by agency employees that the agency deemed "consequential." Numerous other irregular tests were considered unimportant.
"The subject matter may be complicated, but the conclusion is simple," Caltrans Director Malcolm Dougherty wrote to members of the state Senate and Assembly transportation committees. "California's transportation infrastructure rests on dependable foundations."
The report, which was spurred by a Bee investigation, was one of several related developments about Caltrans testing and the new San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge this week.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Sacramento Bee
State officials approved $100,000 for an independent review of the new Bay Bridge, to address concerns raised in a Bee investigation.
The Federal Highway Administration released a report critical of Caltrans for its testing lapses and for improperly removing steel beams from federally funded job sites.
The governor formally began a countdown clock for the opening of the new Bay Bridge on Sept. 3.
Caltrans officials ordered the 612-page report about the bridge data problems in late 2011 in response to Bee reports that identified problems in testing procedures, and testing and construction lapses involving the new eastern span of the Bay Bridge and other structures.
According to the report, due to gaps and still-unanswered questions about the data, not all concerns about the work of Caltrans' Foundation Testing Branch could be laid to rest.
The six-member research group, composed of engineers and other experts, were dubbed the "GamDat" team because the relevant data was collected using "gamma-gamma loggers," a type of radiation-based testing probe. The team found that procedures meant to calibrate and ensure the reliability of that instrument also had been falsified, but probably had no effect on any structures.
Irregular test data for portions of the new Bay Bridge tower foundation – apparently caused by errors in technique by technicians who examined the structure – were considered minor and irrelevant to the strength of that span.
Deficiencies in how Caltrans organized and archived its test data made file identification challenging, according to the report. Thousands of data files could not be located, in part because an archival computer server crashed, destroying all data. It had not been backed up. Duane Wiles, a technician who confessed to falsifying data, retained unrestricted access to data archives long after his fraud was discovered, according to Caltrans internal memos The Bee obtained.
Consequently, an unknown number of data problems might have gone undetected.
The GamDat team did not interview anyone associated with doctored data, and made no comment on possible motivations for such actions. The report recommended sweeping changes in how the agency conducts and manages such testing, including upgraded file management and archiving systems, and improved test procedures.
Dougherty wrote to legislators that Caltrans was already implementing improvements.
The report did not address concerns about separate sonic tests of the new Bay Bridge tower foundation, detailed in a Bee investigation last May.
The Toll Bridge Program Oversight Committee – a state agency that oversees seismic retrofitting for Bay Area toll bridges – on Wednesday agreed to underwrite an independent review of the new span, and pledged full cooperation to the effort.
The California Senate Transportation Committee asked the Legislative Analyst's Office to oversee that review, and then requested funding from the toll bridge committee. That group comprises Dougherty of Caltrans; Steve Heminger, executive director of the Bay Area Toll Authority; and Bimla G. Rhinehart, executive director of the California Transportation Commission.
In their letter to Sen. Mark DeSaulnier, D-Concord, who chairs the Transportation Committee, the three executives noted "the importance of completing this review well in advance of the scheduled opening of the new east span over Labor Day weekend." They requested that the LAO "rely to the greatest extent possible on documents already developed by Caltrans and reviews already conducted by agencies and groups external to the department."
DeSaulnier said in an interview that while he also supports an expeditious review, the LAO will examine the relevant issues without restrictions.
The LAO "has a lot of integrity and a great reputation, and I'm not going to compromise it," he said.
The Senate request for the new study came in response to Bee investigations that reported gaps in key records and doubts about the tower foundation raised by outside experts. The Bee also reported on financial and professional conflicts of interest by the Caltrans panel of engineers who favorably reviewed the bridge last year.
Also on Thursday, the Federal Highway Administration released an examination of the Caltrans Foundation Testing Branch – mandating improvements in data management and further research on "improper procurement" of construction materials from federally funded job sites.
The federal report finalized an investigation that began in March 2010. It said that Caltrans must have test procedures and data reviewed by outside experts, which took place during the GamDat process.
It also said Caltrans must determine how much steel was improperly salvaged by its employees, and if needed reimburse the federal government. The report ordered Caltrans to improve controls against fraud, waste and abuse.
The federal report summarized many of the concerns raised in prior draft versions, but excluded references to possible illegality by Wiles or his supervisor, Brian Liebich, who was fired from his job as head of the testing branch in 2011. Caltrans fired Liebich, in part, for alleged theft of federal construction materials and related abuse of pay rules regarding his employees. Liebich has denied the allegations and has appealed his firing.
Also excised from the draft reports were references to Caltrans' failure to inform the federal government promptly when state officials learned that Wiles had fabricated data involving structures previously reported as sound – actions that can jeopardize federal aid for highway projects.
Doug Hecox, a spokesman for the federal agency, could not be reached for comment.