Legislation limiting law enforcement's ability to confiscate property from Californians not convicted of crimes failed badly in the Assembly on Thursday, a fate the bill's author forcefully attributed to a disingenuous campaign by opponents.
Asset forfeiture allows peace officers to seize cash and property from people they suspect of crimes. Proponents call it a tool to cripple large criminal enterprises by cutting off their financing, but critics argue it has been abused to pad police budgets.
Current California law requires a conviction to take assets worth less than $25,000. Senate Bill 443 would have mandated a conviction to seize property worth any amount. In cases when the state pursues a case with federal authorities and confiscates property without obtaining a conviction, as federal law allows, the state could not receive any proceeds.
“We have today the opportunity to restore a core principle of American justice, and that is that no person’s property can be taken from him or her without due process of law,” said Assemblyman David Hadley, R-Manhattan Beach.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Sacramento Bee
But Assembly members worried SB 443 would undercut investigations and rejected the bill on a lopsided 24-41 vote. Law enforcement groups vigorously opposed the bill, saying it would cost them money. They circulated alerts warning it would handicap their pursuit of “sophisticated and well-funded criminal enterprises.”
“If all of us are serious about people who are responsible for the most violent crimes – the drug trade, the organized crime – the most powerful way you can hit them where it truly hurts is law enforcement tools like these asset forfeitures,” said Assemblyman Luis Alejo, D-Watsonville.
The bill’s author, Sen. Holly Mitchell, D-Los Angeles, attributed the bill’s failure to “bullying advocacy tactics” by opponents.
“They have a sense of entitlement to assets that don’t belong to them,” Mitchell said, adding that law enforcement agencies were defending “a way to continue to bolster their budgets.”