This week’s State Worker column takes a look at Harris v. Quinn, a U.S. Supreme Court case with implications for government employees nationwide.
The heart of the debate: Can the law compel payment to government-employee unions for collective bargaining and other non-political services that benefit all represented employees? Or does everything that those unions do, including contract deals, fall into a zone of “public concern” that shouldn’t be supported by compulsory payments from employees?
Our column quotes from Tuesday’s oral arguments in Washington, D.C. Several readers have asked us to post the transcript, so we’ve embedded it below. For users who can’t view the embed, click here to download the document.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Sacramento Bee
With just 400 to 450 words for our weekly State Worker column, much of what we learn each week never sees print. Column Extras give you some of the notes, the quotes, the documents and the observations that inform what's published.