WASHINGTON – I’m getting that déjà vu feeling as House Republicans these past several days have failed to alter the public’s perception that they’re incapable of governing.
This week marked Episode 2, Season 2 in the series “Homeland Security Face-Off.” Subtitle: “How Republicans Forfeit the White House in 2016.”
Notwithstanding Tuesday afternoon’s vote, which funded the Department of Homeland Security through the end of the fiscal year, last week’s high-stakes game of chicken – and this week’s near repeat – provides a lesson for future skirmishes.
We’ve seen this all before. House Speaker John Boehner tries to get his conference to act rationally, but the 52 or so whose mission is to act disruptively at any opportunity force the House majority into a “bad deal,” to borrow from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s description of our current negotiations with Iran.
President Barack Obama, much of the media and the tea party gang share common cause in placing blame for the House’s fumblings on Boehner’s leadership. But comparisons to previous speakers are too facile. Times change.
Lest the tea party faction or the Freedom Caucus construct an effigy in my image, allow me to note that, yes, they are doing their people’s bidding. These folks who prefer shutdowns to compromise were elected to stand on principle, no matter the consequences. Given that most are in no danger of being challenged in their home districts, they seem perfectly content to oblige.
They may be viewed as villains in Washington but they’re hailed as heroes back home, where hating Beltway insiders is a Campaign Pledge.
But principles defended at the expense of pragmatic application is the business of priests.
Here on terra firma, if you lose, you lose. You may be re-elected as approval for your zeal as a live-free-or-die, stand-with-Bibi, “Duck Dynasty” patriot, but to what effect if one’s ability to bring about change is neutered in the process?
It is fair to note that Boehner hasn’t been able to corral enough votes to move forward with any momentum. In 2013, he essentially caved to his members and allowed them to shut down the government. But it is also true that a leader can’t lead those whose proudest accomplishment is to not follow.
Not even Majority Whip Steve Scalise, who is a member of the tea party, has been able to whip his brethren into line. Herding cats? Loading frogs into a wheelbarrow? There is yet no simile or metaphor adequate to describe the moment. How about this: They are like the football player who intercepts a pass, then turns around and runs the ball over the opposing team’s goal line.
Insisting that Homeland Security funding be attached to the president’s executive actions to curtail deportations of immigrants here illegally – a predictably losing gamble for Republicans – was a touchdown for the other team.
Once again, Democrats were handed the opportunity to point out that Republicans aren’t in town to govern. They’re in town to lose.
Whether this changes public perception sufficiently – and whether it can hold through the Republican primary process – is yet to be seen. In the meantime, what we do know is that a Republican can’t win the presidency if the party more widely is considered not ready for prime time.
Without the 40 percent of the Hispanic vote widely considered necessary to win – and enough independents and moderates who are turned off by the more-righteous-than-thou Freedom Caucus – a Republican doesn’t stand a chance.
Kathleen Parker’s email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.