Viewpoints

Mouring the Las Vegas shooting won’t end carnage. Sensible policy steps might help

A group of women wait for their ride outside the Thomas & Mack center, which served as a refuge, following a mass shooting at the Route 91 music festival along the Las Vegas Strip, Monday.
A group of women wait for their ride outside the Thomas & Mack center, which served as a refuge, following a mass shooting at the Route 91 music festival along the Las Vegas Strip, Monday. AP

After the horrific mass shooting in Las Vegas, the impulse of politicians will be to lower flags, offer moments of silence and lead a national mourning. Yet what we need most of all isn’t mourning, but action to lower the toll of guns in America.

We don’t need to simply acquiesce to this kind of slaughter. When Australia suffered a mass shooting in 1996, the country united behind tougher laws on firearms. As a result, the gun homicide rate was almost halved, and the gun suicide rate dropped by half, according to the Journal of Public Health Policy.

Skeptics will say that there are no magic wands and that laws can’t make the carnage go away. To some extent, they’re right. Some criminals will always be able to obtain guns, especially in a country like America that is awash with 300 million firearms. We are always likely to have higher gun death rates than Europe.

But the scale is staggering. Since 1970, more Americans have died from guns, including suicides, murders and accidents, than the sum total of all the Americans who died in all the wars in American history. Every day, 92 Americans die from guns, and kids are 14 times as likely to die from guns as children in other developed countries, according to David Hemenway of Harvard.

So while there’s no magic wand available, here are some steps we could take that would, collectively, make a difference:

▪ Impose universal background checks for anyone buying a gun. Four out of five Americans support this measure to prevent criminals or terrorists from obtaining guns.

▪ Impose a minimum age limit of 21 on gun purchases. This is already the law for handgun purchases in many states, and it mirrors the law on buying alcohol.

▪ Enforce a ban on possession of guns by anyone subject to a domestic violence protection order.

▪ Limit gun purchases by any one person to no more than, say, two a month, and make serial numbers harder to remove.

▪ Adopt microstamping of cartridges so that they can be traced to the gun that fired them, useful for solving gun crimes.

▪ Invest in “smart gun” purchases by police departments or the U.S. military, to promote their use. Such guns require a PIN or can only be fired when near a particular bracelet or other device, so that children cannot misuse them and they are less vulnerable to theft. The gun industry resists smart guns.

▪ Require safe storage, to reduce theft, suicide and accidents by children.

▪ Invest in research to see what interventions will be more effective in reducing gun deaths.

These are all modest steps, and I can’t claim that they would have an overwhelming effect. But public health experts think it’s plausible that well-crafted safety measures like these could reduce gun deaths by one-third – or more than 10,000 a year.

It’s too soon to know what, if anything, might have prevented the shooting in Las Vegas. In some ways, these mass shootings are anomalies: Most gun deaths occur in ones or twos, usually with handguns, and suicides outnumber murders.

But in every other sphere, we at least use safety regulations to try to reduce death and injury. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has seven pages of rules about ladders, which kill 300 people a year. Yet the federal government doesn’t make a serious effort to reduce gun deaths, with a toll more than 100 times as high.

We’ve reduced the auto fatality rate per 100 million miles driven by more than 95 percent since 1921. There was no single solution but rather many incremental efforts: seat belts, air bags, padded dashboards, better bumpers, lighted roads, highway guardrails, graduated licenses for young people, crackdowns on drunken driving, limits on left turns, and so on. We haven’t banned automobiles, and we haven’t eliminated auto deaths, but we have learned to make them safer – and we should do the same with guns.

The gun lobby will say that this isn’t a time for politics. But if we can’t learn from this carnage, then there will be more such shootings – again and again. This is a particularly American tragedy and completely unnecessary.

So let’s mourn. But even more important, let’s act.

  Comments