Sacramento residents sue to stop river trail project in Pocket and Greenhaven
AI-generated summary reviewed by our newsroom.
- Residents sue to void council approval, alleging city bypassed environmental law
- Lawsuit argues 1997 EIR is outdated after decades of plan changes and use growth
- City approved four-mile trail segment to close the largest remaining river gap
Sacramento’s long-awaited plan to build a continuous Sacramento River Parkway is facing a new challenge from residents who say the city cut environmental corners to move the project forward.
A lawsuit, filed in Sacramento Superior Court, alleges the city violated environmental law when the City Council unanimously approved the plans for a new four-mile segment of the trail last month. The approval would extend a paved path between Garcia Bend and Zacharias parks with access ramps at North Point Way, Audubon Circle and Country River Way.
The city has pursued a continuous Sacramento River Parkway, a multi-use trail along the west edge of the Pocket through Freeport, since adopting a master plan in 1975. The council’s approval on Oct. 16 intended to close the largest remaining gap in the 17-mile river trail.
But the residents, who filed the lawsuit last week, argue the city improperly relied on a 1997 environmental impact report for the project. EIRs, required under state law, assess the environmental effects of a project.
The lawsuit alleges the nearly three decades of changes to the trail plan, including heavier projected use and expanded access points, will increase the “severity of the environmental effects” such as privacy, security and noise. The lawsuit argues the city must conduct a new supplemental EIR to address those issues.
City spokesperson Gabby Miller did not provide comment, citing the pending litigation.
The lawsuit asks a judge to invalidate the City Council’s October approval. Jordan Sisson, the attorney representing the residents, did not respond to a request for comment.
At last month’s council meeting, most of the public speakers were in support of the project. They called the construction long overdue and pointed to the trail’s benefits for cyclist and pedestrian safety.
Opposition to the Sacramento River Parkway is not new with residents living on the riverfront land pushing back for years. The project will require buying easements for the trail or using eminent domain, meaning providing compensation to some property owners living along the river to acquire the land needed.
