Capitol Alert

Tax hike for business too close to call as California counts its votes

A major tax hike for California businesses hung in the balance Tuesday as voters considered an effort to raise money by overhauling the state’s property tax system.

The measure trailed narrowly as votes were counted, with 52% opposed and 48% in support.

Both supporters and opponents said they were not surprised that the race wasn’t called.

“This is going to be very close, and we don’t expect to know the outcome for a couple days at least,” pro-Proposition 15 spokesman Alex Stack wrote in a text message to The Bee. “But we’re confident!”

Proposition 15 sought to make the biggest change to California property tax law since 1978, when voters approved Proposition 13, an anti-tax measure that set all property taxes in the state based on purchase price.

Under the proposed change, California businesses that own more than $3 million dollars in commercial or industrial property would be taxed based on current market value.

“Thanks to what is expected to be near-historic turnout, we anticipated that we would not know the outcome of Prop 15 on Election Night,” opposition campaign spokesman Michael Bustamante wrote in a statement Tuesday night. “We continue to be optimistic that growing opposition to Prop 15 seen in recent polls will ultimately drive us to victory when all of the votes are counted.”

The initiative promised to be a big increase for large businesses that have owned property for a long time because of rising property values. It was forecast to bring in between $8 billion and $12.5 billion in additional tax revenue per year by 2025, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office. Currently, property taxes bring in about $65 billion per year.

Some of the money would go to increasing staffing in county assessors offices that will be responsible for a much greater workload under the law. The rest will fund schools and local governments, which are desperate for more money because of the COVID-19 driven recession.

The measure exempts residential property and farmland. It also delays implementation for buildings that primarily rent their space to small businesses.

Opponents of the measure argue small businesses that rent their spaces would be hit hard by the reassessments because the increased costs would be passed to them through their lease agreements. Independent economists say there will likely be some effect on small businesses, but how much will vary depending on market forces.

Supporters argue that the measure adequately protects small businesses and that many will actually see an overall tax cut because of a provision that exempts their business equipment from taxes. Businesses that are too large to qualify for the complete exemption will still be able to exempt $500,000 of their business equipment from taxes.

Although the measure is expected to bring in more revenue for most communities, some rural communities could see a reduction because of the business property tax exemption, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.

In the final weeks before Election Day, the campaign supporting Proposition 15 emphasized that the measure will close tax loopholes that allow large businesses to keep their property taxes low and give the money to firefighters, schools and other local services.

Although the measure does not affect residential property, opponents had targeted homeowners with their message about protecting California’s 1978 measure.

The measure was one of the most closely watched contests on California ballots. The race attracted more than $130 million in spending. On the supporting side, the California Teachers Association and Service Employees International Union were the biggest contributors. Real estate companies including Blackstone were the largest donors to the opposition.

Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and Gov. Gavin Newsom all backed the measure. Many business groups and the California Farm Bureau fiercely opposed it.

Another property tax measure, Proposition 19, was also on California ballots Tuesday. That measure would allow homeowners over 55 to transfer their property tax rates to a new house. It also would end a policy that allows people who rent out inherited homes to keep their inherited property tax rate.

That measure was narrowly leading, with 51.5% supporting and 48.5% opposed.

This story was originally published November 3, 2020 at 8:26 PM.

Get one year of unlimited digital access for $159.99
#ReadLocal

Only 44¢ per day

SUBSCRIBE NOW