California governor won’t share his schedule. Is Gavin Newsom secretive or elitist? | Opinion
Where there is no transparency, there can be no accountability.
That is not a partisan ideal, but an American one; and every American politician, president and governor — all the way down to an ad hoc committee on school lunches — should hold themselves to it, or be held to it.
Why, then, is Gov. Gavin Newsom dodging such basic, everyday transparencies like sharing his schedules?
Last week, reporters from The Bee and other outlets attempted to follow Newsom’s schedule for two days through Washington D.C., as he took multiple meetings with high-profile names such as Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Alex Padilla and President Joe Biden.
But Newsom’s office never made public where he was going or who he was meeting with until after the meetings had occurred.
Reporters want to be aware of these meetings so they can ask questions on behalf of the public; and politicians are usually at least willing to talk to reporters about their schedules. But that’s not the case for Newsom, who makes political moves in supercilious secrecy.
The last schedule listing on the governor’s media advisory website was for January 31, more than two weeks ago. With the exception of a tweet from the governor last Thursday about how the Democratic Governors Association had named him policy chairman, Californians have been in the dark about the business of the governor they elected.
By these actions, Newsom is effectively telling his constituents that whatever limited information he deigns to share will be micromanaged through his public relations team on social media.
Newsom’s high-handed attitude toward transparency is beyond arrogant. Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris release a portion of their schedules in advance. Congress, too, makes its detailed committee schedules available days in advance on its House and Senate websites.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and newly elected Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders also share their schedules with the public — surely a comparison Newsom would rather no one draw.
So why is Newsom’s schedule kept secret? His advisors say they simply don’t have time to share it.
“It was more a function of figuring out what we could share depending on the folks he was meeting with,” Newsom’s deputy press secretary, Daniel Villaseñor, told The Bee. “A lot of those meetings were being nailed down at the time. We were figuring out logistically what we could share ahead of time.”
Really? That’s a curious statement from an administration that has shown it can communicate instantly and effectively when Newsom’s interests are served. But when the public’s interest should be served that’s somehow a bridge too far?
This behavior is exactly why Newsom is so regularly accused by his constituents and opponents alike of elitism. It’s a characterization his administration attempts to mitigate by flooding the news with glossy photos of the telegenic governor rolling up his sleeves. But it’s a reputation the Newsom administration has earned.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREWhat are editorials, and who writes them?
Editorials represent the collective opinion of The Sacramento Bee Editorial Board.
They do not reflect the individual opinions of board members or the views of Bee reporters in the news section. Bee reporters do not participate in editorial board deliberations or weigh in on board decisions. The same rules apply to our sister publications, The Modesto Bee, Fresno Bee, Merced Sun-Star and San Luis Obispo Tribune.
In Sacramento, our board includes Bee Executive Editor Colleen McCain Nelson, McClatchy California Opinion Editor Marcos Breton, opinion writers Robin Epley, Tom Philp, LeBron Antonio Hill and op-ed editor Hannah Holzer.
In Fresno and Merced, the board includes Central Valley Executive Editor Don Blount, Senior Editor Christopher Kirkpatrick, Opinion Editor Juan Esparza Loera, and opinion writer Tad Weber.
In Modesto, the board includes Senior Editor Carlos Virgen and in San Luis Obispo, it includes Opinion Editor Stephanie Finucane.
We base our opinions on reporting by our colleagues in the news section, and our own reporting and interviews. Our members attend public meetings, call people and follow-up on story ideas from readers just as news reporters do. Unlike objective reporters, we share our judgments and state clearly what we think should happen based on our knowledge.
Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
Tell us what you think
You may or may not agree with our perspective. We believe disagreement is healthy and necessary for a functioning democracy. If you would like to share your own views on events important to the Sacramento region, you may write a letter to the editor (150 words or less) using this form, or email an op-ed (650-750 words) to opinion@sacbee.com. Due to a high volume of submissions, we are not able to publish everything we receive.
Support The Sacramento Bee
These conversations are important for our community. Keep the conversation going by supporting The Sacramento Bee. Subscribe here.
This story was originally published February 17, 2023 at 12:00 AM.