Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Opinion

CA’s death penalty is broken, says Newsom. So why won’t he end it for good? | Opinion

A condemned inmate is led to his cell in San Quentin’s death row on March 25, 2024. California is shutting down death row and transferring 471 condemned people out of the prison and into the general population at other prisons throughout the state.
A condemned inmate is led to his cell in San Quentin’s death row on March 25, 2024. California is shutting down death row and transferring 471 condemned people out of the prison and into the general population at other prisons throughout the state. Los Angeles Times

At 12:38 a.m on Jan. 17, 2006, the state of California executed Clarence Ray Allen, 76, by lethal injection inside San Quentin State Prison. Allen had been convicted of three counts of first degree murder with special circumstances, and had been sent to Death Row in 1982, nearly a quarter of a century prior.

Now, on the 20th anniversary of the state’s most recent execution, civil rights advocates are pushing to make this California’s last execution ever by ending the state’s death penalty. They want Gov. Gavin Newsom to begin the lengthy legal process to commute the sentences of nearly 600 Death Row inmates and stop the charade of seeking the death penalty — a punishment that does little to deter capital crimes, and costs the state billions to pursue — only to see those inmates sit in capital punishment stasis for years.

There is some hope.

In 2019, Newsom signed an executive order that placed a moratorium on the death penalty in California, ended California’s lethal injection protocols and immediately closed the execution chamber at San Quentin.

Newsom said the state’s ​“death penal­ty sys­tem has been, by all mea­sures, a fail­ure.” According to the Death Penalty Information Center, the number of inmates on California’s Death Row recently fell under 600 for the first time in decades, no doubt in part due to the governor’s moratorium, and in part because of the cost of pursuing a death penalty case.

In 2020, the governor filed an amicus brief before the California Supreme Court in support of a death row inmate appealing a case that involved issues of racial bias: “California’s capital punishment scheme is now, and always has been, infected by racism,” Newsom said in the brief.

But since then, the governor has done little to further the end of death penalty recommendations in California. And the state’s death row inmates sit in a legal purgatory that could revert — or be interminably extended — by the next occupant of the governor’s desk.

Even putting questions of morality or public support aside, the process of commuting 600 Death Row sentences is not as easy as the governor signing a piece of paper.

The California state constitution requires that any prisoner with multiple felony convictions cannot have their death sentences unilaterally commuted by the governor. Newsom would need to signal his intent, but nearly two thirds of current Death Row prisoners would need to be approved for commutation by the state’s Supreme Court.

The phones to stop an execution hang on the wall in the background near the execution chamber of San Quentin Prison, Friday June 20, 2003.
The phones to stop an execution hang on the wall in the background near the execution chamber of San Quentin Prison, Friday June 20, 2003. Brian Baer Sacramento Bee file

“It’s not simple. It’s not something he can just do on his last day in office,” said Natasha Minsker, an attor­ney and con­sul­tant, who previously spent 14 years at the American Civil Liberties Union and a decade as its Director of Death Penalty Policy.

“So now is a good time to be asking: What is the future of the death penalty in California?” she said.

Newsom’s dilemma

​“The inten­tion­al killing of anoth­er per­son is wrong, and, as governor, I will not over­see the exe­cu­tion of any indi­vid­ual,” Newsom said when he signed the moratorium in 2019.

Newsom cited evidence that the death penalty system regularly dis­crim­i­nat­ed against defen­dants who are men­tal­ly ill, Black and brown or who cannot afford expen­sive legal rep­re­sen­ta­tion. It provides little to no pub­lic safe­ty ben­e­fit or any val­ue as a deter­rent, and it has wast­ed bil­lions of tax­pay­er dol­lars.

“Most of all, the death penal­ty is absolute,” Newsom said. “It’s irre­versible and irrepara­ble in the event of human error.”

And yet, Newsom has been frustratingly unclear about what he will do with the few months he has left in office to fully erase the death penalty as an option for prosecutors. It doesn’t bode well for those who say the governor needs to move quickly.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference at the State Capitol on March 13, 2019 in Sacramento. Newsom put a moratorium on the death penalty in California on Wednesday, sparing the lives of more than 700 death-row inmates.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference at the State Capitol on March 13, 2019 in Sacramento. Newsom put a moratorium on the death penalty in California on Wednesday, sparing the lives of more than 700 death-row inmates. Renee C. Byer rbyer@sacbee.com

In a written statement to The Bee, a Newsom spokesperson wasn’t clear about Newsom’s next steps on the issue.

“The governor has long made clear his concerns about California’s current death penalty system, which is why he implemented his March 2019 Moratorium,” said Newsom spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo. “California will continue our work to move beyond Death Row — in a way that is respectful to crime victims, survivors and their families.”

California will continue the work … but not Newsom?

It’s becoming increasingly clear that, as our governor considers a run at the White House, he’s unlikely to do anything controversial that could jeopardize the votes of the nation’s conservative voters. But that idea may be misguided.

While support for the death penalty is higher among Republicans than among Democrats and Independents, there have been case studies across the country that prove public opinion is shifting.

In 2019, con­ser­v­a­tive leg­is­la­tors spon­sored death penal­ty abo­li­tion bills in 11 states, includ­ing Wyoming, Montana and Kentucky, and conservatives are play­ing crit­i­cal roles in bipar­ti­san efforts to repeal or reform cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment in states such as Virginia, Ohio and New Hampshire, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

The cost of death

The governor’s office reported that, between 1978 and 2019, California had spent $5 billion on a death penalty system that has executed 13 people. Most of those costs go toward trial costs, automatic appeals and federal habeas corpus appeals.

“Of the 591 people sentenced to death, half of them don’t have a lawyer,” Minsker said. “And (they) can’t move forward … without a lawyer. The cases just take literally decades.”

Even if the governor wanted to carry out executions, she said, the vast majority of Death Row cases never reach that point in the legal system, in no small part because the prisoners die still awaiting trial.

A condemned inmate is led out of his east block cell on death row at San Quentin State Prison in August 2016.
A condemned inmate is led out of his east block cell on death row at San Quentin State Prison in August 2016. Eric Risberg AP file

Only about a dozen California counties still regularly charge the death penalty at all, and half of those use it for leverage or in plea bargaining, Minsker said.

In a 2015 article, Professor Robert J. Smith of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill called Riverside County, ​“the buck­le of a new Death Belt,” because it — alongside Kern, Orange and San Bernardino counties — has replaced the Deep South in pro­duc­ing death sen­tences.

But in Northern California, it’s Sacramento County that is the most aggressive — with 11 death penalty charges in the last 10 years.

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation report­ed that 13 death-sen­tenced peo­ple died on Death Row in 2025. That’s the largest num­ber on record, except for in 2020, when 19 pris­on­ers died, at least a dozen of those due to a COVID out­break in San Quentin, the Death Penalty Information Center reports.

Since the 1970s, only 13 men have been exe­cut­ed in California while 180 peo­ple have died on Death Row in that same time. Twice as many con­demned peo­ple have com­mit­ted sui­cide in California awaiting execution as have actually been exe­cut­ed.

California is spending billions of dollars on a system that is stuck in limbo, for the benefit of a symbolic penalty — Death Row — that means nothing. Newsom’s past actions have made it clear that he deplores capital punishment as deeply as many civil rights advocates, and he has it in his power now to end the death penalty once and for all in California.

What’s stopping him?

Robin Epley
Opinion Contributor,
The Sacramento Bee
Robin Epley is an opinion writer for The Sacramento Bee, with a focus on Sacramento County politics. She was born and raised in Sacramento, was a member of the Chico Enterprise-Record’s Pulitzer Prize-finalist team for coverage of the Camp Fire, and is a graduate of Chico State.
Get one year of unlimited digital access for $159.99
#ReadLocal

Only 44¢ per day

SUBSCRIBE NOW