World leaders in Glasgow followed the California Democrat model: big talk, little action
Leaders and delegates from across the world heralded the United Nations climate summit in Glasgow as an imperfect victory. A flurry of new commitments and pledges to end deforestation and slash methane emissions were held up as signature achievements. Yet the culminating Glasgow Climate Pact falls short of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius and averting climate catastrophe.
Instead of “phasing out” fossil fuels and ending counteractive subsidies, China and India gave ultimatums that allowed industry-friendly “phase-down” language to make the final draft. There was no fund created to help vulnerable nations already suffering from climate change mostly caused by wealthier countries like ours.
In essence, world leaders finally unified in recognizing the existential threat that climate change poses, but they failed to deliver an agreement that would prevent its most disastrous form. Meanwhile, more symbols of the impending future can be found in British Columbia, where a summer of extreme heat, mass death and destructive wildfires preceded the landslides and flooding currently afflicting Canada’s western province.
In many ways, what we saw in Glasgow was a page out of the California playbook. The pact mirrored a form of redefined climate denialism adopted by California Democrats, whose hyperbole and rhetorical alarm sounds good but routinely fails to produce the type of action required to lead a nation-state troubled by weather extremes toward a safer future.
The largest delegation at COP26 was from the fossil fuel industry, which — like California’s well-connected trades and building associations — successfully stopped stronger commitments to expedite clean energy.
This year, Gov. Gavin Newsom and state Democrats touted a $15 billion package to “tackle the climate crisis,” anchored by important disaster mitigation initiatives and comprehensive environmental protections that will make California more resilient. However, only $1.5 billion will be spent on greenhouse gas reduction, largely through deeper investments to support zero-emission vehicles. Even worse, $735 million to accelerate progress on clean energy goals and $1 billion to enhance transit and rail projects was deferred to next year.
So while California is doing more to strengthen our climate resilience, Democrats are doing much less to reduce the amount of carbon leaking into our atmosphere, and they are too cowardly to divest from the fossil fuel industry altogether.
On any other issue, progress is a worthwhile accomplishment. Watered-down police reforms still improve accountability. Banning single-family zoning at least allows more duplexes and four-plexes. Funding for motel conversions moves homeless people into safer shelter. Intentional forest treatment slows the spread of wildfires.
But there is no room for incremental progress when it comes to the rising temperature of our planet. Humans have already warmed the planet roughly 1.1 degrees Celsius since the 19th century, and U.N. researchers say the gulf between long-term net-zero promises and our current plans puts us on a track for 2.5 degrees Celsius — well past our nightmare scenario.
California sent an impressive delegation to Glasgow, a mix of top administration officials and legislators led by Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis — after Newsom infamously bowed out at the last minute. On a global stage, she rightly touted our air quality authority and enormous economic power to concurrently reduce emissions and expand the economy. In a COP26 press conference, state Sen. Josh Becker, D-San Mateo, promised legislation to achieve net zero emissions by 2035, 10 years ahead of the state’s current goal. If California is serious about climate action, passing this bill must be a top priority next year.
Hope is not entirely lost. Or, as COP26 President Alok Sharma put it, “We can say with credibility that we have kept 1.5 degrees within reach, but its pulse is weak. It will only survive if we keep our promises.”
California Democrats have shown how much they love making promises. But when it comes to cutting out fossil fuels, they are rarely kept. If COP26 was “the last, best hope” for climate action, further delay by California’s Democratic supermajority will help extinguish what little is left.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREWhat are editorials, and who writes them?
Editorials represent the collective opinion of The Sacramento Bee Editorial Board.
They do not reflect the individual opinions of board members or the views of Bee reporters in the news section. Bee reporters do not participate in editorial board deliberations or weigh in on board decisions. The same rules apply to our sister publications, The Modesto Bee, Fresno Bee, Merced Sun-Star and San Luis Obispo Tribune.
In Sacramento, our board includes Bee Executive Editor Colleen McCain Nelson, McClatchy California Opinion Editor Marcos Breton, opinion writers Robin Epley, Tom Philp, LeBron Antonio Hill and op-ed editor Hannah Holzer.
In Fresno and Merced, the board includes Central Valley Executive Editor Don Blount, Senior Editor Christopher Kirkpatrick, Opinion Editor Juan Esparza Loera, and opinion writer Tad Weber.
In Modesto, the board includes Senior Editor Carlos Virgen and in San Luis Obispo, it includes Opinion Editor Stephanie Finucane.
We base our opinions on reporting by our colleagues in the news section, and our own reporting and interviews. Our members attend public meetings, call people and follow-up on story ideas from readers just as news reporters do. Unlike objective reporters, we share our judgments and state clearly what we think should happen based on our knowledge.
Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
Tell us what you think
You may or may not agree with our perspective. We believe disagreement is healthy and necessary for a functioning democracy. If you would like to share your own views on events important to the Sacramento region, you may write a letter to the editor (150 words or less) using this form, or email an op-ed (650-750 words) to opinion@sacbee.com. Due to a high volume of submissions, we are not able to publish everything we receive.
Support The Sacramento Bee
These conversations are important for our community. Keep the conversation going by supporting The Sacramento Bee. Subscribe here.