Sacramento Bee Logo

The false promise behind the FCC net neutrality repeal plan | The Sacramento Bee

×
  • E-edition
    • Customer Service
    • SacBee Rewards
    • About Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Apps
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Twitter, Facebook, Google+, YouTube
    • News in Education (NIE)
  • Newsletters

    • Sacramento Region
    • Arena
    • City Beat
    • Crime
    • Local Govt Salary Database
    • The Homeless
    • Marcos Bretón
    • Transportation
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health & Medicine
    • Traffic Conditions
    • Weather
    • Communities
    • Elk Grove
    • Folsom/El Dorado
    • Roseville/Placer
    • Yolo
    • Sports
    • Kings
    • NBA News
    • 49ers
    • Giants
    • Oakland A's
    • High School Sports
    • Joe Davidson
    • More Sports
    • Raiders
    • NFL News
    • MLB News
    • River Cats
    • Soccer
    • Colleges
    • Golf
    • Autos Racing
    • Politics
    • Capitol Alert
    • State Workers
    • The California Influencer Series
    • Local Elections
    • PoliGRAPH
    • State Worker Salary Database
    • Legislative Gifts
    • Local Elections
    • California Elections
    • Election Endorsements
    • Election 2018
    • Voter Guide
    • Investigations
    • Data Tracker
    • Public Eye
    • Afghan Refugees
    • Nursing Homes
    • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Election Endorsements
    • Viewpoints
    • Influencers Opinion
    • California Forum
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Submit a Letter
    • Jack Ohman
    • Editorial Board
    • Entertainment & Life
    • Arts & Theater
    • Books
    • Home & Garden
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Outdoors
    • Pets
    • Travel
    • More Entertainment
    • Events Calendar
    • Horoscopes
    • Comics
    • Puzzles
    • TV Listings
    • Sacbee Rewards
    • Food & Drink
    • Restaurants News & Reviews
    • Restaurant Directory
    • Cooking & Recipes
    • Beer
    • Wine
    • Appetizers Blog
    • California
    • Big Valley
    • Marijuana
    • Wildfires
    • Water & Drought
    • Lottery
    • Business
    • Real Estate
    • Market Summary
    • Cathie Anderson
    • Nation & World
    • National
    • World
    • Technology
    • Family
    • Celebrities
    • TV news
    • Weird News
    • Video Break
    • News Obituaries
    • Death Notices
    • FAQ
    • ObitMessenger
    • In Memoriam

    • The Sacramento Bee Store
    • Golf Card
    • Farm to Fork Dining Card
  • Jobs
  • Moonlighting
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Classifieds
  • Legal Notices
  • Place an Ad
  • Advertise
  • Mobile & Apps

Viewpoints

The false promise behind the FCC net neutrality repeal plan

By Jessica Rich The Washington Post

    ORDER REPRINT →

December 12, 2017 12:35 PM

If all goes as expected, the Federal Communications Commission will repeal its net neutrality rules Thursday by party-line vote. In doing so, the FCC will undermine the principles the Internet was built upon, freeing Internet service providers from the ban on blocking, throttling or prioritizing Internet content. And the proposed replacement to protect American consumers - who overwhelmingly support these rules - from these types of activities? A scaled-back “transparency rule” that only requires Internet providers to inform consumers before they engage in these anti-competitive activities.

 
Opinion

Don’t worry, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has said, because the Federal Trade Commission will step in to protect consumers from any bad acts that Internet providers might commit in the future. That may sound like a reasonable plan. After all, the FTC is a consumer protection agency that polices the marketplace for fraud and false advertising.

But as someone who spent more than 25 years enforcing the law at the FTC, I know there’s a serious problem with touting the FTC as a substitute for the soon-to-be-repealed net neutrality rules. Putting aside the question of whether the FTC has the resources and rulemaking powers to adequately address this important issue (it doesn’t), there’s the more fundamental question of whether the FTC even has legal authority over Internet providers.

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to The Sacramento Bee

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

Buried in the FTC’s founding statute is something called the “common carrier exemption,” which excludes from the FTC’s authority any company engaged in “common carriage” (think telephones, railroads, etc.). When the law was passed, these companies essentially did one thing - such as provide phone service - and the idea was that other federal agencies with industry-specific expertise, such as the FCC, would monitor this specialized activity.

In the digital age, however, the definition of “common carriage” has become increasingly murky. As telecom conglomerates have expanded their offerings beyond phone service, what does the common-carrier exemption now apply to - the telecom company as a whole or its individual product offerings?

For years, Republican and Democratic administrations, as well as the courts, generally said it was the latter, with the FCC having exclusive jurisdiction over phone service and the two agencies sharing jurisdiction over everything else a company provides, including broadband service. But when the FCC reclassified broadband service as common carriage in the 2015 Open Internet Order, providing the legal basis for the net neutrality rules, it eliminated FTC jurisdiction over those services. After all, broadband was now going to be governed by strong net neutrality rules.

Unfortunately, as the FCC chairman well knows, reversal of the 2015 order won’t simply restore the FTC’s broadband jurisdiction. That’s because, separately, the question of whether the FTC has jurisdiction over any services offered by a telecom company is under serious challenge in the courts.

In 2014, the FTC sued AT&T before the current net neutrality rules were enacted - for advertising “unlimited” data plans to consumers but then “throttling” their data use if they reached a certain limit. AT&T argued that the FTC had no jurisdiction to sue because AT&T was a common carrier.

At the time of the lawsuit, though telephone voice service offered by AT&T was clearly a common-carrier service, broadband service wasn’t and the FTC prevailed in the lower court. But in a surprise ruling last year, a three-judge panel from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the lower court, deciding in favor of AT&T. It ruled that if you’re a common carrier, you’re exempt from FTC enforcement even if you offer non-common-carrier services.

What is the status of this case now? Unresolved. The 9th Circuit has agreed to rehear the case before the full appeals court.But its impact on the repeal of net neutrality can’t be overstated. If the court again rules in favor of AT&T, then Pai’s assurance that the FTC can and will protect consumers from Internet providers after the rollback of net neutrality is simply not true.

The current reality is that relying upon the FTC to assume enforcement power over Internet providers is a giant gamble. Depending on what happens in a courthouse in San Francisco, millions of broadband customers could be left without any regulator or enforcer to act on their behalf after the repeal of the current net neutrality rules. At the very least, wouldn’t prudence dictate we wait and see what happens in this case before charging forward with repeal?

 
Sign up
Get on The Take. Read the influential voices on California and national politics and issues. Sign up here.

Jessica Rich is the vice president of policy and mobilization for Consumer Reports and was director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection from 2013 to 2017.

  Comments  

Videos

Painting the Delta

Homeless in Sacramento

View More Video

Trending Stories

You kill it, you grill it? New California bill would let drivers legally eat roadkill

February 21, 2019 10:18 AM

Vlade Divac won DeMarcus Cousins trade and Kings are playing ‘beautiful basketball’

February 21, 2019 03:55 AM

No speed limit? That could become a reality for two California highways

February 21, 2019 01:14 PM

Embattled California DMV gets its third director in just 32 days

February 21, 2019 10:13 AM

How trains under the bay - not high-speed rail - may connect Sacramento and San Francisco

February 20, 2019 12:58 PM

Read Next

We need a child care system that keeps California working and children learning

Viewpoints

We need a child care system that keeps California working and children learning

By Monique Limón Special to The Sacramento Bee

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 21, 2019 12:01 AM

I’ve introduced legislation, Assembly Bill 378, which would allow child care providers to collectively bargain with the state so they can more effectively advocate for California families, including their own.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to The Sacramento Bee

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE VIEWPOINTS

California kids need $17 million to close digital divide, Newsom can make that happen

Viewpoints

California kids need $17 million to close digital divide, Newsom can make that happen

February 21, 2019 12:01 AM
Tyranny is un-American.  It is time to kick our wannabe dictator out

Viewpoints

Tyranny is un-American. It is time to kick our wannabe dictator out

February 20, 2019 12:01 AM
Commentary: Has Newsom become Governor Gaslight?

Viewpoints

Commentary: Has Newsom become Governor Gaslight?

February 20, 2019 03:30 AM
Inland California: the backbone of our state

Viewpoints

Inland California: the backbone of our state

February 18, 2019 12:01 AM
Gov. Newsom’s decision to change high-speed rail plan doesn’t go far enough

Ben Boychuk

Gov. Newsom’s decision to change high-speed rail plan doesn’t go far enough

February 17, 2019 12:01 AM
Lots of luck to Amy Klobuchar. History shows she’ll need it

California Forum

Lots of luck to Amy Klobuchar. History shows she’ll need it

February 16, 2019 12:01 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

The Sacramento Bee App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Vacation Hold
  • Pay Your Bill
  • Rewards
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Photo Store
Advertising
  • Place a Classified Ad
  • Place a Legal Notice
  • Place a Digital Ad
  • Place a Newspaper Ad
Copyright
Commenting Policy
Corrections Policy
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story