Viewpoints

Joe Mathews: Declare an election emergency in L.A., then experiment

Eric Garcetti won a high-profile race for Los Angeles mayor in 2013, but voter turnout barely hit 20 percent. Joe Mathews asks: If California’s civic leaders are so sure that Los Angeles elections are democratic disasters, why don’t they declare an official state of emergency?
Eric Garcetti won a high-profile race for Los Angeles mayor in 2013, but voter turnout barely hit 20 percent. Joe Mathews asks: If California’s civic leaders are so sure that Los Angeles elections are democratic disasters, why don’t they declare an official state of emergency? Associated Press file

Like a man who bangs his head against the wall to cure a headache, Los Angeles will hold more municipal elections in March. The certain result – another low-turnout embarrassment that draws the usual lamentations about how our democracy is in peril.

Enough crying. If California’s civic leaders are so sure that Los Angeles elections are democratic disasters, why don’t they declare an official state of emergency?

In other California contexts, disasters draw interventions and lead to big changes. After an earthquake or fire, officials can declare emergencies and take decisive action without following the usual regulations. When California school districts don’t meet academic standards or go underwater financially, the state can take them over.

If there were a similar method for reconstituting poorly attended elections, Los Angeles would be among the first in line. Voter turnout percentages in school board and special elections have been in the single digits. During the 2013 Los Angeles city elections, turnout barely hit 20 percent, even with a competitive mayoral race.

Although Los Angeles County has 3 million more people and 1 million more registered voters than the Bay Area counties put together, more votes are cast in the Bay Area than in L.A. After the miserably low Southland turnout last November, new Secretary of State Alex Padilla, who is from L.A., told The Sacramento Bee: “You still have those counties where you have 70 percent turnout. And then you have L.A. County. It’s a shame.”

That shame has triggered commissions and recommendations, but not enough action. Today only one turnout-boosting proposal has traction – moving municipal and school elections to even-numbered years to coincide with high-turnout gubernatorial and presidential elections. But even if voters approve that change (in March’s low-turnout election), it won’t take effect until 2020.

As with any disaster, L.A. elections present opportunities for bigger, faster changes. Voter turnout is declining in much of the industrialized world. We need a place to test the many turnout-boosting ideas of scholars and officials. The very thing that makes L.A. politics so confusing – elections in 88 cities, 150 or so school districts, and many special districts – would make it the perfect laboratory.

Instead of trying just one idea at the time, L.A. could host multiple, simultaneous experiments. To start, California leaders should tweak state and local laws to make L.A. an election emergency zone. Exempt local election officials (such as the county’s creative registrar Dean Logan) from as many laws as possible for at least a decade. Provide funds to experiment with any strategy that might boost turnout. Appoint a commission of researchers to monitor the resulting experiments.

What would this look like? One idea recently debated by the Los Angeles City Council is offering cash prizes to voters in a lottery. Why not take similar precincts, try different cash-for-voting schemes and see which work best?

Many experts are convinced that L.A. must ramp up its vote-by-mail efforts, while others argue that the mail doesn’t reach young people. So why not experiment with robust vote-by-mail in parts of Los Angeles and see who’s right?

The good news is that there is no shortage of ideas to test. Could the signage in polling places be changed to draw people in? Could voting in nontraditional venues – malls, movie theaters, In-N-Out Burgers – boost turnout? Would allowing voters to vote at any precinct in the city help? What if the city decided not to give parking tickets on Election Day (at least around polling stations)?

I’d urge even more dramatic experiments in the L.A. election emergency zone. It would be interesting to see if making local elections partisan affairs might attract more voters in this partisan age (as some political scientists predict).

As a legal and political matter, state leaders would have to authorize this grand experiment. Big problems in L.A. – brutal cops, failed jails, terrible Clippers owners – very rarely get fixed by Angelenos themselves. The L.A. election emergency zone would cost California money, but the state would benefit from what is learned. California is near the bottom nationwide in getting eligible citizens to register and vote. It will be hard to improve upon this ranking until Los Angeles elections are no longer disasters.

Joe Mathews is California and Innovation editor at Zócalo Public Square, for which he writes the Connecting California column.

  Comments