The honorable thing to do for Afghan refugees: Given the anti-refugee hysteria fanned by President-elect Donald Trump and some of his backers, extending a special visa program for Afghans who helped U.S. forces is a big win for our values. But Congress also needs to do more to make sure Afghan refugees succeed.
The date that, 75 years later, must still be recalled: Three quarters of a century have now passed since the bombing of Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, a human lifespan, give or take. The men and women who served on that “date which will live in infamy” are almost all gone.
Dan Walters explores the implications of repealing Obamacare and points out that it would hit Republicans’ constituents hard.
Jim Gonzalez: President Obama should pardon “dreamers” to stop the Trump deportations.
Robert Blair Osborn: We should all think about quitting social media.
Chad Hanson: How logging proponents ignore science in the Sierra.
Miami Herald: Pearl Harbor foes must keep order. Wednesday marks the 75th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor. Now, America’s two main antagonists in that war – Germany and Japan – will have to become more prominent defenders of the international order the United States built after its victory.
San Francisco Chronicle: California attorney general must fix state’s gang database now.
Los Angeles Times: Earthquakes are equal-opportunity destroyers.
Orange County Register: How should California Democrats use their supermajority?
The (San Jose) Mercury News: Housing shortage doesn’t excuse deadly Oakland inferno.
The (Raleigh) News & Observer: Pat McCrory’s governorship stands as a cautionary tale for any politician who would seek to take the helm without a sense of where to go.
Kathleen Parker: Will Electoral College be brave and stop Trump?
Ruben Navarrette: Trump’s Cabinet picks antagonize Latinos.
Dana Milbank: ‘Pizzagate’ could be the new normal.
Letters to the editor
Taking a chance
The California State Lands Commission, a rather obscure state entity, took the rather bold step of confronting Silicon Valley billionaire Vinod Khosla.
Khosla owns the land above Martins Beach, a lovely strip of San Mateo County beach, including the access road to it, and is battling state efforts to require that he allow unfettered access.
“We aren’t backing off,” Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, one of three Lands Commission members, told the audience of perhaps 100 people, many of them advocates for beach access.
The commission voted to begin the process of invoking eminent domain. But Newsom made clear he hopes for a settlement. That’s wise. The cost is one issue. The commission staff pegs the cost of seizing the access road at $360,000. Khosla’s lawyers have put the cost at tens of millions.
More ominous, however, is Khosla’s threat to press his suit challenging the state’s authority to require beach access. Perhaps, the state would prevail and uphold long-standing law that the public must have access to beaches.
Then again, a U.S. Supreme Court, filled by an appointee of President/real estate mogul Donald Trump, could decide that property owners’ rights are paramount.