Is finding the best PE prep course starting to feel like a gamble?
There are more than 20 PE exam types, each with its own format and rules, and that alone can make the whole process feel confusing at first. A solid study system changes that. Strong prep always shows up in pass rates, and I went through these courses myself to see which ones actually make studying feel manageable instead of miserable.
In this guide, I will break down the top PE prep courses, discipline-specific programs, on-demand options, live classes, practice tests, and the materials that help the most before your exam date.
| Best PE Prep Courses | ||
 |
| Get Started |
 |
| Get Started |
 |
| Get Started |
 |
| Get Started |
 |
| Get Started |
Which PE Prep Course Is Best for You?
- Best Overall Course: School of PE – strongest mix of discipline-specific content, flexible formats, instructor support, and structured modules.
- Top Traditional Structure: PPI – great for engineers who want a classic, step-by-step system with manuals, homework, and expert-led lessons.
- Best Focused Civil Option: Civil Engineering Academy – ideal for PE Civil students who want clear videos, depth-specific modules, and flexible on-demand study.
- Best Minimalist Civil Review: American Society of Civil Engineers – works well if you want a simple, session-based PE Civil depth review without extra tools or platform features.
- Best Weekly Class Experience: Engineering Education and Training – a good choice if you prefer live or scheduled classes, structured workshops, and a steady lecture-first pace, especially for Civil depth exams.
- Best Simple, Narrated Review: Capstone Learning – a solid option for engineers who want slower-paced, narrated lessons with worked examples and do not need advanced digital tools.
School of PE: Best Overall
For this review, I evaluated School of PE as a study system rather than an exam-taker, spending time inside the platform to assess navigation, lesson flow, instructor support, and how discipline-specific paths are structured. I reviewed on-demand lessons, live session recordings, problem explanations, and Instructor Connect responses to see how clearly the material is taught and how easy it is to stay organized while studying.
When I tested School of PE, the first thing that stood out was how specific the courses felt. Instead of dropping everyone into one big program, you choose the exact discipline you’re taking. Civil students get civil content, mechanical students get mechanical content, and so on. This makes studying easier because you won’t have to scroll past topics that didn’t apply to your specific exam. The layout is clean enough that even on tired evenings, I could log in and know where to pick back up.
Instructor Connect helped more than I expected. Anytime something didn’t click, I sent in a question and got a clear explanation. Most days, I used the OnDemand lessons, and on tougher topics, I swapped over to live sessions so an instructor could walk through the solutions in real time.
“Hello all. I’m very happy to report I passed the PE Mechanical: MDM test on my first attempt. In short, I used the School of PE review course, did the entire Question Bank…”
Student Feedback.
| School of PE Ratings | |
|---|---|
| Feature | Rating |
| Ease of Use | 9.8 |
| Practice Tools | 9.7 |
| Video Lessons | 9.7 |
| Technology | 10.0 |
| Instruction | 9.9 |
| Student Support | 9.8 |
| Guarantees | 9.6 |
| Policies & Access | 9.7 |
Package Options
- OnDemand: Comes with video lessons, workbook access, and practice problems. Best for busy students who want to study anytime at their own pace.
- Live Online plus OnDemand: Includes live classes, recordings, and full On-Demand materials. Best for students who want real-time instruction with flexible review.
- Monthly Subscription: Gives month-to-month access to the On-Demand course. Best for fast study plans or short final refreshers.
Key Features
- Live Online, On-Demand, and Onsite formats
- Discipline-specific lessons and problem sets
- Instructor Connect for unlimited questions
- Pass Guarantee included for eligible courses
- High reported pass rates across most PE tracks
- Organized modules that guide you through each topic in order
- Built for engineers who want content that matches their exact exam specifications
Pros
- Targeted Content: Each course focuses only on your discipline instead of making you sift through unrelated material.
- Helpful Instructor Access: Getting quick answers through Instructor Connect kept me from losing momentum.
- Flexible Formats: Easy to switch between live sessions and on-demand study depending on the day.
- Strong Structure: Lessons move in a clean order, which helped a lot during short study windows.
- Pass Guarantee: Eligible courses include extra protection if you need a second attempt.
Cons
- Large Course Catalog: It can feel overwhelming at first if you’re not sure which PE track to pick.
Bottom Line: Why Choose School of PE?
School of PE is the best fit if you want a prep program built around your exact PE discipline. The focused content, structured lessons, and instructor support make studying easier to manage, especially if you’re balancing work and a tight schedule.
School of PE
PPI2Pass: Full-Scope and Reference-Heavy
When I tested PPI2Pass, it felt like the most traditional PE review course of the major programs, but in a good way. Everything runs on a clear structure: expert-led lessons, guided study plans, reference manuals, quizzes, and full-length practice exams. Instead of bouncing between tools, you move through the material in a steady order, which works well if you want a predictable routine from day one.
The PPI Learning Hub ties everything together. Your study plan connects to digital books, diagnostic exams, and solved examples, so you always know what to work on next. The content is thorough without feeling overwhelming, and you can tell it’s created by licensed engineers who have taught this material for years. The only drawback is that it feels slower and more textbook-heavy than other programs like School of PE, which offers more flexibility and quicker shifts between study formats.
| PPI2Pass PE Course Ratings | |
|---|---|
| Feature | Rating |
| Ease of Use | 9.2 |
| Practice Tools | 9.1 |
| Video Lessons | 9.0 |
| Technology | 9.0 |
| Instruction | 9.6 |
| Student Support | 9.5 |
| Guarantees | 9.2 |
| Policies & Access | 9.0 |
Package Options
- Live Online Course Bundle: Comes with live classes, instructor support, office hours, and recordings. Best for students who want a full classroom-style experience with real-time teaching.
- On-Demand Course Bundle: Includes On-Demand lectures, slides, homework, calculator lessons, and two practice exams. Best for students who want structure but prefer studying on their own schedule.
- Self-Study: Learning Hub Bundle: Gives access to the reference manuals, practice problems, and the quiz generator. Best for independent learners who only need the study materials.
Key Features
- Structured lessons taught by licensed professional engineers
- Detailed class notes, problem demos, and homework assignments
- Review manuals aligned with the current NCEES exam
- Full practice exams and diagnostic exams to check progress
- Quiz Generator for custom topic reviews
- Study plans that guide you from start to finish
- Pass Guarantee for eligible live courses
Pros
- Traditional, Proven Structure: Predictable lesson flow with manuals, homework, and quizzes.
- Deep Reference Library: Manuals and problem books cover every tested topic.
- Strong Instructor Instruction: Office hours and expert-led lessons add clarity.
- Accurate NCEES Alignment: Content matches current exam specs closely.
- Built-In Study Plans: Daily guidance removes guesswork.
Cons
- Heavier Reading Load: Works best for students who are comfortable learning through manuals and guided assignments.
- Less Flexible Style: Feels more classroom-based compared to newer, adaptive platforms.
“The PPI system just helped me pass the Mechanical thermal and fluid systems exam on my first attempt. Studied for about 2.5 months. The exam was challenging, though my undergraduate degree was in chemical engineering.”
Student Review.
Bottom Line: Why Choose PPI?
PPI is a strong fit if you want a traditional, highly structured program with a full library of reference materials and expert-led instruction. It keeps everything organized and gives you a very clear path from the first day of studying to your exam date.
PPI2Pass
Civil Engineering Academy: Civil-Only Prep That Stays On Topic
This review is based on time spent inside Civil Engineering Academy’s PE Civil platform, focusing on video pacing, solution walkthroughs, depth organization, and overall usability. I evaluated how clearly concepts are explained and how easily a student can follow the course independently.
Let me just say that Civil Engineering Academy’s PE Civil course feels very focused. Everything is built just for PE Civil, and each depth track sticks to the exact exam topics. The videos move at a comfortable pace, and the step-by-step solutions make tougher areas easier to work through.
The on-demand format is easy to manage, and the workshop sessions help when you want to see full solutions explained. The student community adds a bit of extra support, too.
I did wish there were more practice problems in some areas, and the setup is simpler than what you get from the School of PE or PPI. But if you want a PE Civil course that stays on topic and doesn’t overcomplicate the study process, CEA fits that style well.
| CEA PE Course Ratings | |
|---|---|
| Feature | Rating |
| Ease of Use | 8.3 |
| Practice Tools | 8.2 |
| Video Lessons | 8.5 |
| Technology | 8.2 |
| Instruction | 8.6 |
| Student Support | 8.3 |
| Guarantees | 8.0 |
| Policies & Access | 8.2 |
Package Options
- Ultimate- One Month Access: Best if you want a quick, focused refresh before your PE civil exam. Includes all depth-specific modules, the student group, the PE civil practice exam, and access to the CBT-style simulator.
- Ultimate- Six Month Access: Good for longer study plans. You get the full PE course, the community, the practice exam, workshop recordings, and more room to work through the material at a steady pace.
- Ultimate- Yearly Access: Helpful if you prefer extra time or need flexibility. Includes everything in the shorter plans plus priority responses and long-term access to the course materials.
Key Features
- Depth-specific PE civil modules organized by the NCEES outline
- Growing library of PE civil video practice problems
- Full-length PE exam-style practice exam
- CBT-style simulator for realistic exam preparation
- Downloadable slides and reference notes
- Private student community with active responses
- On-demand access on any device
Pros
- Targeted Civil Content: Built specifically for the PE civil exam.
- Clear Video Walkthroughs: Step-by-step solutions help when concepts feel heavy.
- Flexible Access: Easy to study on your own schedule.
- Supportive Community: Quick help from students and instructors.
Cons
- Civil Only: Not a fit if you need other PE disciplines.
- Video-Heavy Format: Best for students who prefer visual explanations.
“Not too bad at all, videos are super helpful in pointing out what is necessary to know and not focusing on 8-10 step intensive problems. Based on my past test-taking experiences it seems pretty on par with the difficulty level of problems.”
Student Feedback.
Bottom Line: Why Choose Civil Engineering Academy?
This course works well if you want a PE civil program that keeps things simple and focused. The mix of clear modules, video practice problems, and community support makes it a solid option for students who prefer a straightforward study path without a lot of extra layers.
Civil Engineering Academy
American Society® Of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Session-Based and Minimalist
ASCE’s Civil PE offers one option, which is its on-demand course. The structure was the part that worked best. The nine-session layout, steady NCEES Handbook references, and quick email support made the lessons easy to follow and close to exam style.
What I ran into while studying is that nothing tracks your progress. One day, I logged back in to review a depth topic and had to check my own notes just to remember what I finished. Unfortunately, there’s no way to see improvement or mark completed sections.
Outside of the organized layout, the course is pretty limited. You get handouts, basic problems, and a simple plan, but not much beyond that. It’s best for those who want a straightforward Civil PE walkthrough without extra platform features.
| ASCE PE Course Ratings | |
|---|---|
| Feature | Rating |
| Ease of Use | 7.8 |
| Practice Tools | 7.6 |
| Video Lessons | 7.9 |
| Technology | 7.7 |
| Instruction | 8.0 |
| Student Support | 7.8 |
| Guarantees | 7.5 |
| Policies & Access | 7.6 |
Key Features
- Over 20 hours of depth-specific instruction
- Nine structured sessions that follow a predictable flow
- Study sheets and practice sets that walk through each solution
- Direct instructor support through email
- Frequent references to the NCEES Reference Handbook
- Six-month access to all course materials
- Extra resources through AccessEngineering
- Study plan guidance from the course director
- Six-month access window
Pros
- Strong Civil Depth Focus: Every course stays tightly aligned with the depth topics.
- Consistent Structure: All tracks follow the same lesson flow, which helps with planning.
- Useful Handouts and Solutions: Makes working through difficult topics easier.
- Direct Instructor Email Support: Helpful for targeted questions.
Cons
- No Progress Tracking: Platform does not monitor completion or performance.
- On-Demand Only Format: No live or hybrid learning options available.
- Limited Practice Quantity: Practice sets are smaller than major prep platforms.
“I am not impressed at all. I am giving the test again this October. And Hope I can do better because I think I was close last time. I went through the School of PE notes and They are much better that the ASCE slides which does not explain anything. The lecturer in the ASCE course ALWAYS ran out of time, ALWAYS.”
Student Feedback.
Bottom Line: Why Choose ASCE?
ASCE is a fit for Civil PE students who want a straightforward, structured depth course without extra platform features. It’s reliable and well organized, but lighter on tools and less flexible compared to the top PE prep providers such as CEA. Good if you like a traditional setup and a simple, consistent path to exam day.
American Society® Of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Engineering Education and Training (EET): Clear Delivery, Limited Tools
My review of EET focused on the live and on-demand class experience, workshop structure, and printed materials, with attention to how the lecture-first format supports consistent study. I evaluated the course from a usability and structure standpoint rather than problem-solving performance.
With that being said, the format is very lecture heavy, especially for Civil-Only PE. Most of the learning happens through long walkthroughs, and the course relies heavily on that classroom style. The live webinars follow the same pace as the on-demand recordings, so you get a steady flow of explanations but not much variation in how the material is presented.
The workshops and quizzes help reinforce the lessons, and the binder keeps everything organized, but the setup stays pretty narrow. The platform doesn’t offer many tools, the practice options are lighter compared to bigger Civil PE programs, and there isn’t much built-in support to guide your weekly routine. If you prefer listening to explanations and working from printed material, EET fits that style. If you want more practice variety, clearer tracking, or stronger digital features, as I had with PPI and other higher-ranked courses, this one feels noticeably limited for Civil PE study.
| EET PE Course Ratings | |
|---|---|
| Feature | Rating |
| Ease of Use | 7.7 |
| Practice Tools | 7.6 |
| Video Lessons | 7.9 |
| Technology | 7.5 |
| Instruction | 8.2 |
| Student Support | 7.7 |
| Guarantees | 7.4 |
| Policies & Access | 7.6 |
Package Options
- Live Webinar / Seminar Subscription: Scheduled live classes, real-time problem-solving workshops, quizzes, a timed simulation exam, instructor access, and a printed binder.
- On-Demand Subscription: Self-paced video lessons, recordings of workshop sessions, quizzes, a full simulation exam, instructor access, and the printed binder are included.
- Civil PE Depth Tracks: Targeted study options for Construction, Geotechnical, Structural, Transportation, and Water & Environment.
- California-Specific Courses: Focused Surveying and Seismic reviews for engineers needing California’s state-specific PE requirements.
Key Features
- Live and On-demand formats
- Problem-solving workshops
- Practice problems and quizzes
- One full-length simulation exam
- Printed binder included
- Instructor access
- Free repeat option
Pros
- Strong Live Class Structure: The set schedule and real-time walkthroughs make the course feel structured and easy to follow.
- Full Simulation Exam: The exam runs close to the real timing and helps with pacing.
- Printed Binder: Keeps all study materials organized without needing extra downloads.
Cons
- Limited Platform Tools: No analytics or adaptive features that larger PE prep programs include.
- Civil-Focused: Fewer PE disciplines than major competitors.
- Live Spots Fill Quickly: Scheduling can be difficult during busy cycles.
Bottom Line: Why Choose EET?
From my experience, EET works best if you want steady lessons and a predictable weekly routine. The workshop sessions and printed binder helped keep things organized, and the simulation exam gave a decent final check before test day. But the platform felt light compared to what I had with PPI. I would have liked more practice variety, clearer tracking, and stronger digital features. If you prefer simple, lecture-style learning, EET can work, but it doesn’t offer the same depth or tool support found in the higher-ranked programs.
Engineering Education and Training (EET)
Capstone Learning: Simple, Instructor-Led PE Review
The Good: Capstone Learning’s PE Review Curriculum has a calm, easy pace. The narrated lessons feel like someone walking you through each idea without rushing, and the dual USCS and SI solutions came in handy when I worked through fluid problems and didn’t feel like stopping for conversions.
The bad: Once I used it more, I noticed the platform is very basic. There’s no progress tracking, no analytics, and no real tools to shape a study plan. I had to hunt around just to remember where I left off, and tutor replies were slower than the other providers I tested. The platform also feels outdated, and it doesn’t have the same recognition as bigger names like School of PE. It’s best for those who want simple, guided explanations and don’t mind a minimal, older-style setup.
| Capstone Learning PE Course Ratings | |
|---|---|
| Feature | Rating |
| Ease of Use | 7.5 |
| Practice Tools | 7.4 |
| Video Lessons | 7.6 |
| Technology | 7.3 |
| Instruction | 7.8 |
| Student Support | 7.3 |
| Guarantees | 7.2 |
| Policies & Access | 7.4 |
Package Options
- Chemical PE Review: About 30 hours of narrated instruction, plus 250 sample problems and reference material indexes.
- Mechanical Systems and Materials: Breadth plus depth content with about 39 hours of lessons and PE tutor access.
- Mechanical, Thermal, and Fluid Systems: Covers breadth plus thermal and fluids depth with around 40 hours of content.
- Civil PE Structural Review: About 20 hours of instruction, with 150-plus structural sample problems.
- Electrical and Computer–Power Review: Roughly 30 hours of lessons for the Power exam, plus reference material indexes.
Key Features
- Up to 40-plus hours of narrated instruction
- 150 to 250 plus sample problems with full solutions
- Built-in PE tutor support across all disciplines
- Topic-specific reference indexes for fast lookups
- USCS and SI unit coverage is included in every course
- A breadth + depth review is combined into one curriculum
Pros
- Easy-to-Follow Lessons: The narrated explanations work well for students who prefer simple guidance.
- Dual Unit Coverage: Helpful to see solutions in both USCS and SI.
Cons
- Limited Practice: Much smaller problem banks than the top-rated providers.
- Minimal Platform Tools: No analytics, performance tracking, or adaptive features.
- Narrow Selection: Few PE disciplines compared to larger competitors.
- Basic Tutor Access: Support is available, but slower and less integrated.
Bottom Line: Why Choose Capstone Learning?
Capstone is a decent fit if you want a basic, lecture-style PE review without extra platform tools. It’s simpler than the major PE programs and works best for students who just want narrated instruction and a small set of practice problems at an affordable price.
Capstone Learning
Other PE Exam Prep Options
These options did not make the cut for best but are still worth considering for supplemental prep:
Head-To-Head: A Closer Comparison
School of PE vs. PPI
School of PE feels more modern and flexible, especially in how you can actually use the course day to day. It gives you 3 different format options (Live Online plus OnDemand, OnDemand-only, and a monthly subscription), so you’re not locked into one way of studying. PPI sticks to 2 main formats (Live Online and On-Demand bundles) and runs on a more fixed schedule built around manuals and assignments.
PPI also includes multiple reference manuals, diagnostic exams, a quiz generator, and at least 2 full-length practice exams in most packages, which makes it feel very traditional and structured. Both work, but the experience really comes down to whether you want flexibility or a set routine.
See the full School of PE and PPI2Pass comparison.
Bottom Line:
→ Choose School of PE if you want flexible learning options and cleaner navigation.
→ Choose PPI if you prefer a classic sequence built around lectures and homework.
School of PE vs. Civil Engineering Academy
School of PE gives you multiple PE disciplines, instructor Q&A, flashcards, and larger problem sets, so it feels like a full system from start to finish. Civil Engineering Academy keeps things very focused with 1 exam type (PE Civil only), 1 full-length practice exam, a CBT-style simulator, and depth-specific video modules. School of PE also offers live classes plus OnDemand, while CEA is OnDemand-only, which keeps things simple. The real difference is how much support and structure you want built into the course.
Bottom Line:
→ Choose the School of PE if you want a more complete setup with instructor help and multiple formats.
→ Choose CEA if you prefer a lighter civil-only course that stays direct and easy to follow.
PPI vs. ASCE
PPI is much heavier overall. It includes multiple practice exams, custom quizzes, study plans, and progress tracking, which helps if you want to see how you’re improving over time. ASCE keeps it minimal with one on-demand course per depth, broken into nine structured sessions, plus handouts and worked examples. There’s no tracking or analytics with ASCE, so you’re mostly managing progress on your own. Both explain the material clearly, but PPI gives you more structure and feedback along the way.
Bottom Line:
→ Choose PPI if you want a guided routine with detailed study materials.
→ Choose ASCE if you prefer a straightforward depth review without added layers.
Civil Engineering Academy vs. Capstone Learning
CEA leans more modern, with a CBT-style simulator, depth-specific civil modules, and community access for questions. Capstone goes the traditional route with 20 to 40 hours of narrated instruction, depending on the course, plus 150 to 250 worked problems. CEA includes 1 full-length PE-style exam, while Capstone focuses more on walkthroughs than exam simulation. It really comes down to whether you want exam-style practice or slow, narrated explanations.
Bottom Line:
→ Choose CEA if you want modern videos, community support, and clear exam-focused content.
→ Choose Capstone if you want basic instruction presented in a traditional, uncomplicated way.
Course Ranking Methodology
I reviewed each PE prep course by going through the lessons, trying the practice tools, and checking how the platforms were organized. I looked at how clear the teaching was, how easy it was to move through the material, and whether the features actually felt helpful while using them.
The goal was to see which courses offered the smoothest overall experience and the most practical support while studying.
PE Prep Course Rating Criteria Table
| Category | Weight (%) | What It Evaluates |
|---|---|---|
| Lesson Clarity & Engineering Accuracy | 25% | How clearly engineering concepts are explained, how well multi-step calculations are broken down, and how closely lessons follow NCEES exam specs. |
| Practice Quality & Realism | 20% | Realism and difficulty of practice problems, thoroughness of solution steps, and inclusion of full exam-style sets. |
| Study Flow & Course Structure | 15% | Organization of modules, smoothness of the study path, and how well the course keeps you on track. |
| Tools & Exam Simulation | 12% | Effectiveness of simulators, reference aids, walkthroughs, and digital tools that reinforce problem-solving. |
| Support & Instructor Help | 10% | Response speed, usefulness of explanations, and how well support helps fix weak areas. |
| Platform Experience | 8% | Interface quality, dashboard layout, loading speed, and ease of navigating lessons and materials. |
| Policies, Access & Flexibility | 5% | Length of course access, renewal options, pass guarantees, and flexibility across study formats. |
| Price-to-Value Ratio | 5% | Overall exam readiness impact relative to cost and included features. |
Final Verdict
From everything I tested, the School of PE stands out the most. It has the cleanest layout, the strongest discipline-specific structure, and the easiest mix of flexibility and guidance. PPI2Pass is a great course if you want a classic, textbook-backed routine. Civil Engineering Academy is a simple option for PE Civil students who want clear videos without extra layers. The rest work if you just need a lighter review, but they didn’t hit as strongly during testing.
Choose the one that matches how you learn. The right setup really does make the study process feel smoother.
FAQs
The PE exam is a licensing test for those who want to become licensed professional engineers. It’s taken after gaining work experience and covers topics based on your engineering field.
Most students spend a few months on their PE exam prep, especially if they’re working. Many PE prep courses offer six months of access so you can move at your own pace.
A PE exam prep course isn’t required, but it helps. A structured PE course saves time, gives you clearer teaching than self-study, and includes practice tests that feel close to the actual exam.
The best PE review courses offer clear video lectures, practice problems, full-length practice exams, and solid instructors. A clean layout and strong exam preparation tools make a big difference.
A PE Civil course focuses only on PE civil exam topics, with in-depth sections based on your discipline. It cuts out content from other PE disciplines and keeps everything civil engineering specific.
