Downtown Sacramento was a big loser in a California budget that stiffed cities | Opinion
Downtown Sacramento, and all urban centers in California, were among the biggest losers in the money sweepstakes known as the state budget. Turning the corner on the homelessness crisis did not get the level of money it needs.
Public schools, meanwhile, fared better, as did Californians who depend on publicly-funded health care or regional transit.
If the state budget is an expression of California’s priorities, state leaders have chosen to overlook the suffering of those who live on our big city streets in order to focus on helping vulnerable individuals who are on the brink of homelessness. The budget that Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature approved late Monday is reliant on tax money that may not materialize if the future months are not as economically rosy as lawmakers assume.
Addressing the many facets of homelessness — shelter, transitional housing, permanent housing, mental health care and drug rehabilitation — has the same established need for funding as education, prisons or parks. Yet homelessness has no similarly established home in the state budget. It has to fight for the leftovers. Big city mayors end up fending for themselves and heading home with far less than they need.
The budget does provide $1 billion for the state’s Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention grant program, an important pot of money that helps cities cover the costs of emergency shelters and other homeless needs.
But the League of California Cities was seeking three times that money, and to make it a permanent funding stream. That ask, in the context of the crisis, was exceedingly modest.
The most comprehensive examination of California homelessness to date recently found that housing is the primary cause. Nearly half are age 50 or older. When surveyed, the chief reason for their plight was the price of rent in California.
Sacramento has established institutional voices that can move the state budget needle inside the process. Primary and secondary schools get a guaranteed slice of the budget. There are strong lobbies to meet the needs of publicly-funded health care, climate change and transit.
Nobody got everything they wanted in this budget, but most needs fared better than homelessness. The unhoused are large in number, some 170,000 Californians and increasing each census. But they are small in clout, with no effective champion inside the halls of power..
Downtown Sacramento will not recover from the pandemic until it is no longer a tent city of human desperation. The same holds true for every major city in California. This is a vast problem that will require extraordinary partnerships among governments to make progress. That will take sufficient money. And that starts with a state budget that makes the needs of our urban cores a priority.
BEHIND THE STORY
MOREWhat are editorials, and who writes them?
Editorials represent the collective opinion of The Sacramento Bee Editorial Board.
They do not reflect the individual opinions of board members or the views of Bee reporters in the news section. Bee reporters do not participate in editorial board deliberations or weigh in on board decisions. The same rules apply to our sister publications, The Modesto Bee, Fresno Bee, Merced Sun-Star and San Luis Obispo Tribune.
In Sacramento, our board includes Bee Executive Editor Colleen McCain Nelson, McClatchy California Opinion Editor Marcos Breton, opinion writers Robin Epley, Tom Philp, LeBron Antonio Hill and op-ed editor Hannah Holzer.
In Fresno and Merced, the board includes Central Valley Executive Editor Don Blount, Senior Editor Christopher Kirkpatrick, Opinion Editor Juan Esparza Loera, and opinion writer Tad Weber.
In Modesto, the board includes Senior Editor Carlos Virgen and in San Luis Obispo, it includes Opinion Editor Stephanie Finucane.
We base our opinions on reporting by our colleagues in the news section, and our own reporting and interviews. Our members attend public meetings, call people and follow-up on story ideas from readers just as news reporters do. Unlike objective reporters, we share our judgments and state clearly what we think should happen based on our knowledge.
Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.
Tell us what you think
You may or may not agree with our perspective. We believe disagreement is healthy and necessary for a functioning democracy. If you would like to share your own views on events important to the Sacramento region, you may write a letter to the editor (150 words or less) using this form, or email an op-ed (650-750 words) to opinion@sacbee.com. Due to a high volume of submissions, we are not able to publish everything we receive.
Support The Sacramento Bee
These conversations are important for our community. Keep the conversation going by supporting The Sacramento Bee. Subscribe here.
This story was originally published June 27, 2023 at 11:17 AM.