Homepage

If the Sierra snowpack vanishes as feared, California will need ideas like this for water

Low water levels leave much of the lakebed exposed at Folsom Lake on Sunday, July 25, 2021, when the reservoir’s surface elevation was 377 feet. The lake holds about a third of its normal amount of water for this time of year.
Low water levels leave much of the lakebed exposed at Folsom Lake on Sunday, July 25, 2021, when the reservoir’s surface elevation was 377 feet. The lake holds about a third of its normal amount of water for this time of year. Sacramento Bee file

Sacramento — which once only had to worry about seasonal floods — now worries each year about delivering water to its citizens in a hotter and drier California.

But there is a way for Sacramento to capture rain and snow, and for the broader region to keep surface reservoirs like Folsom and Oroville lakes nearly full. This same technique could help Sacramento capture enough water to share with neighboring areas in dry years, as well as to store it when we need it most.

It’s called groundwater banking. The need for it will only become more urgent as the Sierra snowpack starts to disappear.

According to a recent study by researchers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, snowpack in the Sierra Nevada mountains will become increasingly scarce, leading to decades-long stretches without snowfall by the 2050s.

Through groundwater banking, providers can divert water into an underground aquifer that is less dependent on seasonal rainfall and can be stored until it is needed.

State and local experts say major funding is needed for this strategy to take root in Sacramento. The Sacramento Regional Water Authority, a joint powers authority representing nearly two dozen local water providers, is seeking funding to capture rainfall and surface water that is currently lost from the Sierra snowpack and surface water reservoirs. It’s a promising plan that deserves consideration from lawmakers as California enters a future shaped by worsening climate change.

Sacramento would be following in the footsteps of others, such as the San Joaquin Valley and San Antonio, Texas, which is the largest city in the U.S. that relies solely on groundwater aquifers for its municipal supply.

An infusion of nearly $300 million could allow the regional water authority to rehabilitate and install new well systems and also solve some of California’s most persistent climate-related challenges.

Roseville is already delivering some bankable water to a small-scale groundwater banking system. Upgraded infrastructure would be able to increase the input from many of the other 20 water purveyors who are part of the regional authority, and help ameliorate snowpack changes impacting our region’s supply.

Banking into these aquifers would better capture water runoff from rain and snow that typically ends up in the sea, and withdraw the water when needed, mitigating environmental damage and the strain on consumers when conservation is needed. Capturing the spring melt could stave off the all-but-certain future of more drought-filled summers.

Experts say no solution will completely solve California’s worsening water woes. But the Sacramento Regional Water Authority, in coalition with the Sacramento Water Forum, could use groundwater banking to maximize the American River watershed and boost the ecological health of the Sacramento Valley and beyond, aiding more of California’s waterways.

Sacramento’s groundwater aquifers could be ideal for this strategy since the groundwater aquifers underneath Sacramento are in better condition than many others in the state.

California should maintain its conservation efforts, but conservation alone is not a realistic solution. Infrastructure investments for strategies like groundwater banking can strengthen the connections between water systems and help distribute more water in wet periods while allowing the use of groundwater during dry periods. It is a worthwhile expense to help maintain the flexibility to move between surface water reservoirs like Folsom Lake and underground basins that can hold twice as much to alleviate runoff losses.

Supporting our water districts will not only allow the residents of the Sacramento Valley to withstand future droughts, but also benefit water users throughout the state.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

What are editorials, and who writes them?

Editorials represent the collective opinion of The Sacramento Bee Editorial Board.

They do not reflect the individual opinions of board members or the views of Bee reporters in the news section. Bee reporters do not participate in editorial board deliberations or weigh in on board decisions. The same rules apply to our sister publications, The Modesto Bee, Fresno Bee, Merced Sun-Star and San Luis Obispo Tribune.

In Sacramento, our board includes Bee Executive Editor Colleen McCain Nelson, McClatchy California Opinion Editor Marcos Breton, opinion writers Robin Epley, Tom Philp, LeBron Antonio Hill and op-ed editor Hannah Holzer.

In Fresno and Merced, the board includes Central Valley Executive Editor Don Blount, Senior Editor Christopher Kirkpatrick, Opinion Editor Juan Esparza Loera, and opinion writer Tad Weber.

In Modesto, the board includes Senior Editor Carlos Virgen and in San Luis Obispo, it includes Opinion Editor Stephanie Finucane.

We base our opinions on reporting by our colleagues in the news section, and our own reporting and interviews. Our members attend public meetings, call people and follow-up on story ideas from readers just as news reporters do. Unlike objective reporters, we share our judgments and state clearly what we think should happen based on our knowledge.

Read more by clicking the arrow in the upper right.

Tell us what you think

You may or may not agree with our perspective. We believe disagreement is healthy and necessary for a functioning democracy. If you would like to share your own views on events important to the Sacramento region, you may write a letter to the editor (150 words or less) using this form, or email an op-ed (650-750 words) to opinion@sacbee.com. Due to a high volume of submissions, we are not able to publish everything we receive.

Support The Sacramento Bee

These conversations are important for our community. Keep the conversation going by supporting The Sacramento Bee. Subscribe here.

This story was originally published February 2, 2022 at 5:00 AM with the headline "If the Sierra snowpack vanishes as feared, California will need ideas like this for water."

Get one year of unlimited digital access for $159.99
#ReadLocal

Only 44¢ per day

SUBSCRIBE NOW